Guardian reports on HTS

by on May 14th, 2008

There is a short piece today in the Guardian about HTS, Minerva, global counterinsurgency, etc., tied to the Michael Bhatia story.  The story also reports on the recent conference hosted by the department of anthropology at the University of Chicago that Oneman attended.  While the story mentions a host of characters we have seen quoted in the press before on this issue, including Fosher, Sahlins, McFate, et al, it also quotes John Kelly, who I haven’t yet seen discussing this issue in the press.

The Bush administration is just trying to buy more time, says John Kelly, chair of the University of Chicago’s high-ranked anthropology department and joint organiser of a conference on anthropology and global counterinsurgency held there last month….  The conference also dissected the Counterinsurgency Manual, a military document that became a US bestseller. The manual implies “an endless future of counterinsurgency interventions,” Kelly notes. “It contains no section on withdrawal.”

Strong is Thomas Strong, lecturer in the department of anthropology at the National University of Ireland, Maynooth. He has previously held teaching and/or research posts at the University of Helsinki, the University of California, San Francisco, the University of Wisconsin, and (oddly enough) the American Academy of Ophthalmology. His publications include essays on the symbolism of blood and body in the U.S. and elsewhere, new cross-disciplinary work on kinship, and ideas of culture loss and bodily detumescence amongst the Dano-speakers of Papua New Guinea's eastern highlands province. His on-going research in PNG concerns transformations in sociality, gender relations, and personhood following the mid-twentieth-century repudiation of the traditional men's cult in the upper Asaro valley. His other interests include 'brand' as an ethnographic and analytic concept, HIV/AIDS (especially in the U.S. gay male community), and celebrity/fame.

2 Comments
  1. John Kelly was one of the organizers of the U Chi conference, and from what I can tell, will be the editor of the edited volume from the proceedings (which should be out by the end of the year or early next year — again, from what I can tell).

    I have a lot to say about the conference, but I came back to 150 term papers and then finals, so I haven’t been able to sit down and collect my thoughts on the conference. All in all, I’d say it was very successful, a really productive meeting. Although there were military representatives there (including a recruiter for HTS who left after the first big session [out of 4]), there was a minimum of violence and upheaval.

    I’ll try to post some highlights after the semester ends next week, if my brain can make sense of the notes I took.

    Report this comment

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Links for 14 May 2008 « ubiwar . conflict in n dimensions

Leave a Reply


Note: HTML allowed. Your email address will never be published. We strictly enforce a common-sense comments policy. (Avatars are linked to your Gravatar account.)

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Comments will be sent to the moderation queue.