Speaking of Academic Celebrities
An interview with David Graeber on Charlie Rose:
2 Comments
→
Recent Comments
- MTBradley: I loved the movie, and the only reason I did was because the Nazis were dehumanized. I have to disagree. The guys in...
- Benni: make that three
- Rick: I just want to say that I just took an ambien so this might fall apart, but I’ll give it a try. I think bringing in...
- Rick: Well, like all Zen student, one needs a master. I think maybe part of this whole dialogue is based on the fact that the...
- MTBradley: The salience of “framing” is obvious to sociologists, linguists, political scientists and others today,...
- Kerim: Thanks. I’m glad at least 2 people enjoyed it!
- MTBradley: When this conversation got revived it occurred to me that another film in the running—Inglourious...
- Rick: “Also, the WASP cultural obsessions with authenticity, immediacy, unmediated communication of subjectivity etc. in...
- Rex: There’s no such thing as conversation without a frame. The point is not to create an interview without a frame, but...
- Johannes Wilm: Rick, you’re right, that probably has a lot to do with it. What they are doing is maybe not necessarily...
-
Recent Posts
Of course it cut off right before he differentiates between good and bad authority. Also, anyone care to enlighten us about his situation with Yale? There was obviously much more to that conversation that emerged from Charlie’s brief treatment of it.
jlo: You might wish to look at this post from a while back.