Award-winningness

I am not a big believer in the true meaningfullness of awards. As a professor, I squirm everytime I have to take each of my student’s unique papers and shove their particularity into the confines of a letter grade. So I don’t believe that books that win awards are somehow necessarily much better than the runners-up (or a lot of other books that have been written). However, I do think there is something wonderful about obscure academic book awards. They give my brain the same tickle as occasional pieces by OHK Spate or Benjamin Franklin’s dialogue with his gout — ethnographically they are, as one of my profs in grad school used to put it, “delicious little somethings.”

I also like book awards becuase they serve as excellent filters on the world of content. In fact I imagine back in the good old days when Amazon.com wasn’t parsing out your preferences that awards were even more important as a filter to direct you to Premium Content. And of course the real book awards are sufficiently old-school that they don’t even have fer-trulies websites.

All of which is to say that in addition to my old-standbys the “Thomas Cook Award”:http://www.thomascookpublishing.com/travelbookawards.htm (an award the celebrates postcolonial imperialist knowledge of The Other in the name of an eponymous old-school imperialist) and the “Victor Turner Award”:http://www.smcm.edu/sha/turner01.htm (an old favorite of mine) I now add the “Edelstein Prize For The History of Technology”:http://shot.press.jhu.edu/Awards/edelstein.htm, which was “established in 1968 through the generosity of the late Sidney Edelstein, a noted expert on the history of dyes and dye processes, founder of the Dexter Chemical Corporation.”

The best part of this prize are the prize winners. Although I don’t do history of technology the books all sound scrumptious. Some — like Machines as the Measure of Men — are already well known to me. But Russell’s _ War and Nature: Fighting Humans and Insects with Chemicals from World War I to Silent Spring_? Ingenious! And the most recent winner is The Soundscape of Modernity: Architectural Acoustics and the Culture of Listening in America, 1900-1933 by Emily Thompson. Another super-intriguing. No wonder she “won a Macarthur”:http://www.macfound.org/site/c.lkLXJ8MQKrH/b.1076861/apps/nl/content2.asp?content_id={86CDA030-FA8E-437D-918E-BE7479D7DF5F}&notoc=1.

Are there any other awards on people’s radars, anthropological or no?

Rex

Alex Golub is an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. His book Leviathans at The Gold Mine has been published by Duke University Press. You can contact him at rex@savageminds.org

2 thoughts on “Award-winningness

  1. Great stuff! I, too, have found the Victor Turner prize winners a great source of some of the most readable anthropology around.

  2. The American Ethnological Society awards were kind of predictable, with one exception. The senior awards went to Michael Fischer (my advisor, hurra!) and Anna Tsing for Emergent Forms of Life and the Anthropological Voice and Friction respectively. The junior awards went to the predictably core anthropolgical study of the Chaco in Argentina Tensions of Place and Memory in the Argentinean Chaco by Gaston R. Gordillo and the surprising one: Being a Buddhist Nun: The Struggle for Enlightenment in the Himalayas by Kim Gutschow which took 14 years of fieldwork and sounds like a doozy of a feminist demonstration of the tensions of theory and practice…

Comments are closed.