Tag Archives: Film

The Librarian: Quest For The Librarian Franchise

Ok since my original post about Librarian: Quest For The Spear I have had a chance to watch the other two movies in the series, Librarian: Return to King Solomon’s Mine and Librarian: A Verb I Forget Whose Direct Object Is The Judas Chalice.

The first thing I learned in writing my post about the love-hate relationship anthropologists have with popcorn films that misrepresent them is that there are far, far more out there than I knew about — indeed, most of the comments on my post were links or mentions of other movies we definitely won’t like. At some point we will have to get together a proper Visual Anthropology conference — not all that informative, artsy stuff Kerim does — and make up a list of the best of the worst (and vice versa).

Second, although the Librarian franchise looses some star power in its future iterations (no more Kyle Maclachlan) the other two are worth seeing — particularly the third one in the series, Librarian: Something Something Judas Chalice. The second one in the series, ‘King Solomon’s Mines’ definitely is better made than the first one, which means that it realizes its vision more completely. The problem, of course, is that vision. This is the movie where The Librarian Goes To Africa and, let’s face it, it’s practically impossible to write make an adventure movie in Africa that will make an anthropologist happy. The second Librarian film is no exception — the tribal mating dances, black people eating insects for gross-out humor effects, they pretty much manage to fit it all in. Additionally, I sort of don’t feel that Gabrielle Anwar works particularly well as the romantic interest. The tension between her and Noah Wyle (they are both bookworms and so compete to see who is the real archaeologist) is certainly there, but in the inevitable scene where he walks in on her, drunk, half clothed in supposedly ‘traditional’ Masai clothing, and they get it on you don’t really understand why she’s fallen for him if she finds him so annoying (other than the fact that its in the script). Also, to be honest, although I think Anwar is going for ‘lithe’ she just looks emaciated to me, and my first impulse is not to see her as a sex object, but to get some calories into her before she passes out. But maybe that’s just the Jewish mother in me.

The third film in the franchise is remarkably similar to Dracula 2000. I know because I saw it. Why did I see Dracula 2000? Was it because I knew about Gerard Butler before he was big? A pre-Firefly crush or Nathan Fillion or a post-Star Trek crush on Jeri Ryan? No. It was because someone told me Christopher Plummer played Van Helsing, and I got him confused with Crispin Glover, and I thought “damn Crispin Glover is completely nuts and rarely does film any more — I’d love to watch him play Van Helsing.” Anyway both films are set in New Orleans — although the Librarian’s ridiculous use of the city as a massive product placement did more to offset production costs than add ambience to the film. Both play with the idea that Vampires are related to Judas Iscariot (is this a common idea?). But there the similarities end.

The female lead, Stana Katic, is much more appealing than Anwar, and we get to see Bruce Davidson produce another one of his “So wholesome… no wait so CREEPY… no wait so wholesome… no wait so – ” performances. Wyle’s character has really come into its own, and is sort of charming — nonviolent (unlike Indiana Jones), constantly coming up with cerebral and often insanely dangerous ways to get out of trouble. The performance is much more assured and the character more likeable than earlier installations in the series. Even the Russian bad guys are great in that sinister eastern-bloc baddie kind of way that I am almost nostalgic for in this age of Those Who Hate Our Freedoms. Yes that’s right: Russians and Vampries in New Orleans.

So there you have it — two more Popcorn Anthropology films. If anyone out there gets around to seeing them, let me know what you think.

Librarian: Quest For The Spear

Despite the popularity of the Indiana Jones franchise, we somehow never got a whole genre out of them: we have racks and racks of kung fu and science fiction flicks, but no ‘archaeology adventures’ rack. There are films that draw on Indiana Jones imagery or themes (I’d actually put the last Indiana Jones movie in that category) but we don’t have mediocre genre flicks. Or so I thought until I saw Librarian: Quest For The Spear.

At root, L:QftS is a Noah Wyle vehicle designed to help the cute-as-the-dickens actor keep from getting labeled a one-hit wonder for his role in ER. In practice, the made for TV movie is a sort of comedic hommage to Indiana Jones which is unapologetic about packing every cliché and gag into one package. On the face of it, the cast is incredible. In addition to Wyle and Sonya Walger (who is apparently famous for being in Lost?) it also feature Bob Newhart, Kyle MacLachlan, and Jane Curtin (Kelly Hu and Olympia Dukakis also have small roles). That’s right: Jane Curtin and Kyle MacLachlan.

The plot of the movie is pretty straightforward: perpetually-ABD archaeologist Wyle stumbles on to a job working at a library that houses All Magic Artifacts (think Night At The Museum crossed with the warehouse where they file away the ark at the end of Raiders) presided over by Curtin and Newhart. Something is stolen and sensitive-scholar Wyle and tough-chick bodyguard Walger head to Tibet, the Amazon, etc. in search of it and eventually defeat MacLachlan. At the end there is a catfight between Hu and Walger over who gets to keep Wyle.

The movie is worth watching — despite how much it made me groan I never turned it off. It might even be teachable as an example of things that drive anthropologists crazy. In the end it ends up in a strange double-bind: it clearly aspires to be a cheesily comedic Raiders remake. At the same time, Wyle doesn’t really seem to have too much in the way of comic chops and, let’s face it, its not that funny. As a result the film both succeeds in being a bad remake while also being a genuinely bad remake.

Apparently Quest For The Spear is only the start — they’ve made two more The Librarian:$VERB $CONJUNCTION $MACGUFFIN films that I haven’t seen (they’re in the queue tho). I’d recommend them if you are looking for an excuse to eat popcorn, become mildly outraged at the presentation of your discipline, and enjoy some mind candy at the same time.

Second Skin

So I just watched Second Skin, a documentary — as far as I know, the only documentary — which focuses squarely on the lives of on-line game players. As someone who is writing now on World Of Warcraft I’m always interested to find videos and films about MMOGs which I can teach and which convey to students, who often have not played these games, what life as a gamer is like both in- and out- of game (you can only show Make Love Not Warcraft so many times). Second Skin succeeds admirably, is put out by an Extremely Indy Company (the envelope containing my copy had my address hand-written on it. There is some guy hand mailing these. That is indy), inexpensive (US$18), and true-to-life — I’d really recommend it to anyone who wants to get a picture of these worlds.

At root, the movie follows the stories of three groups of gamers: a group of friends in Fort Wayne who try to manage the transition from slackerdom to being married parents with real lives while also managing the transition from World of Warcraft 1.0 to Burning Crusade; a man who became addicted to the Internet and his relationship with the woman who runs the Internet Addiction Recovery Group he joined and later left (and that woman’s own troubled relationship to her son — transference much?); and a couple who met online, fell in love, and spend the movie trying to keep their real-life relationship going.

Most of the gamers involved play World of Warcraft of Everquest II, and their stories ring very true to anyone who has extensive experience playing these kinds of game. The film makers do an excellent job of demonstrating how meaningful life on line is for people, especially people with sucky real life jobs. At the same time, they show how unfulfilling life on-line can be compared to the actual world. Walking this fine line without demonizing or glorifying the lives of hard-core game players is probably the finest achievement of the film. The portrayal is so true: the rooms strewn with empty soda bottles, people explaining how the ennui of their jobs makes raiding seem better than real life, and of course the numerous protestations that people would stop playing the game is their girlfriend/spouse/job asked them to. Finally, someone who understands the interesting story about MMOGs is not RMT and gold farming, but overweight Americans eating cheese spray and falling asleep at their keyboards trying to level to 70.

The movie has its flaws as well — in an attempt to be scarily complete, it has segments on disabled people who play video games, Chinese gold farmers, game conventions and cosplay, and real life guild meetings. I appreciate just how much was fit into the film, but at times I felt that we lost focus of the main thread of the exposition. This is a particularly big deal for me, because I need a 50 minute cut of this movie to show in class (or even 60 minutes). Remix, anyone?

The film also spends a lot of time flipping back and forth between people and their avatars — which is fun at first, even if it is a pretty established thing to do (‘get it? he’s a Night Elf!’). However after a while one tires of shots of two people walking hand and hand down a beach, and then their two avatars walking hand and hand down an avatar beach. Also, although many of the visuals in the film really help convey the complexities of game mechanics, at times they look strangely fakey to people who really do play a lot of WoW. In the battle of the Machinima, I think the South Park guys win over the Second Skin guys.

These quibbles aside, however, there is no doubt that Second Skin is well worth your time. I’m not a visual anthropology person or a film scholar, but as far as I can tell the movie is not just ethnographically true, but pretty well made — in particular, the Internet Addict and the woman who seek to save him are given plenty of screen time, and as we learn more about each of them we are able to understand the complexity of their relationship, and the ambiguities of ‘Internet Addiction’ (is the Internet addictive or is the guy an addict?) and all with a relatively light authorial hand. In particular at the end the guy looks like Brando in profile. Like the young Brando.

So if it is out in Netflix, or if you have a couple of bucks to spare, or if you have ILL powers, I’d highly recommend this film — if you are looking to learn more about MMOGs, this is the way to do it. If you are an educator looking for something to show students, its also great. Hats off to the guys at Pure West — here’s hoping they’re getting ready to do a sequel on Cataclysm!

Isuma TV

Faye Ginsburg, one of the leading anthropologists on the topic of global indigenous media, has a post on In Media Res about the two latest projects from Igloolik Isuma, the folks behind the wonderful movie Atanarjuat The Fast Runner:

Their most recent film (see clip),   Before Tomorrow (2008, Arnait women’s collective), is gathering prizes on its festival run. The group formed in 1990, turning televisual technologies into vehicles for cultural expression of Inuit lives and histories,  a counterpoint to the introduction of mainstream satellite-based television into the Canadian Arctic.  Headed by director Zacharias Kunuk, Isuma engages  Igloolik  community members while filmmaker and Isuma partner Norman Cohn leads a support team in Montreal. Frustrated by the difficulty of  showing work to other Inuit communities, in 2008,  they launched a groundbreaking alternative for indigenous distribution, Isuma TV, a free internet video portal for global indigenous media, available to local audiences and worldwide viewers.

The post is followed by comments from Pam Wilson, who writes about other new outlets for indigenous media online:

The increase in opportunities for distribution of native-produced media, either on Isuma TV and other websites or on nationwide television cable channels in Canada (APTN: www.aptn.ca),  New Zealand (Maori TV: www.maoritelevision.com), Taiwan (Taiwan Indigenous TV: www.titv.org.tw/about_e1.htm) or Australia (National Indigenous Television: http://nitv.org.au) has kick-started and sparked a political, social, and artistic renaissance of visual media production of new proportions.

If you know of other, similar projects please share them in the comments!

UPDATE: Video in the Villages has a YouTube Channel!

Washing dirty linen in public

I’ve never been in a country more obsessed about how it is represented abroad than India. There is a TV show I saw there devoted to how the international media was talking about the country. Many of the Indians I’ve met are so incredibly embarrassed by any failure to live up to what they imagine my Western sensibilities to be that they are constantly apologizing for things I haven’t complained about. Not all Indians of course. This collective symbolic violence seems to be felt most particularly by the new upwardly mobile urban middle classes. The members of the elite I’ve met seem protected by their own erudite pride in India’s intellectual, historical, scientific, and artistic traditions. They see nothing to apologize for. And the poor whom I’ve had the privilege to meet are equally proud. They are proud of their clean homes (or in some cases roadside shelters), their few possessions and their children – all of which they’ve struggled for.

So I’m not surprised to read about the uproar surrounding Slumdog Millionaire. I happened to like this film, for many of the same reasons David Bordwell does; namely, its creative re-imagining of tried-and-true movie clichés. He also provides an interesting historical view:

Indian criticisms of the image of poverty in Slumdog remind me of reactions to Italian Neorealism from authorities concerned about Italy’s image abroad. The government undersecretary Giulio Andreotti claimed that films by Rossellini, De Sica, and others were “washing Italy’s dirty linen in public.” Andreotti wrote that De Sica’s Umberto D had rendered “wretched service to his fatherland, which is also the fatherland of . . . progressive social legislation.”

I would be much more sympathetic to such complaints if the Indian middle class was more concerned about the actual poverty surrounding them than the appearance of that poverty to Western eyes.

Continue reading

Night Cries

I want to thank Tim Stevens for his comment on my last post, alerting me to UbuWeb, which I didn’t know about. Their collection has many excellent experimental films and documentaries which anthropologists would be interested in. I wanted to highlight one, in particular, which I often use in my courses: Tracey Moffatt’s Night Cries:

A short experimental film shot totally in a studio, it is about the relationship between an Aboriginal daughter and her white mother. The daughter, now the sole carer of her dying mother, dreams of far away places.

I’ve already found many other treasures on this site, and I feel I’ve barely begun to scratch the surface.

Free Documentary Films Online

I was really excited to learn (via BoingBoing) that the National Film Board of Canada has posted over 700 films, trailers, and clips up to their website. Many NFB documentaries are now available for free online viewing. They have also created special thematic “playlists” highlighting important films in their collection. Gil Cardinal has put together one entitled: “The Aboriginal Voice: the National Film Board and Aboriginal Filmmaking through the Years,” and NFB collections expert Albert Ohayon has put together one called “Canada’s Diverse Cultures,” both of which look very interesting.

Other good sources for free documentary films online are: moviesfoundonline.com, bodocus.com, freedocumentaries.org, and teachpeace.com all of which seem to list many of the same movies. Even more can be found at the internet archive, although it’s a little hard to find things there unless you already know what you are looking for.

UPDATE: Looking through the internet archive I discovered the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Films collection, which has some interesting historical materials.

Stone-Age Links

I found a couple of interesting links browsing through the comments section on BoingBoing’s post about the “uncontacted” Amazon tribe Strong just wrote about.

The first is the story of the “Stone Age Tasaday“:

Who are the Tasaday? Depending on whom you ask, you’ll hear very different answers to this question. You’ll either hear that they’re a group of leaf-wearing, stone-age-tool-using cave dwellers who, when they were discovered in 1971 living in a rain forest on the Philippine island of Mindanao, believed they were the only people in the world. Or you’ll hear that they’re a complete fraud… poor farmers who were cynically coerced into posing as a stone-age tribe by powerful politicians. What’s the truth? To that there is no simple answer.

The second is a 10 minute contribution by Werner Herzog to a 2002 film. Herzog’s segment is called “10,000 years older” and can be found on YouTube in three parts (Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3).

There is also a short film on the Survival International website.

We’ve also had a number of “first contact” related posts on Savage Minds:

I’ll update this post with additional links as I find them.

Annee Sociologique The Movie Part Deux

Because it is Friday, here are updates for our planned production of Annee Sociologique, the movie:

First, after Laura’s wonderful post, it is clear that we will have to cast “Malkovitch”:http://www.ameliakunhardt.com/images/portraits/portrait5.jpg as “Durkheim”:http://www.luventicus.org/articulos/03U011/durkheim.jpg.

As for Gabriel Tarde, I think we have two options — if we are going for farcical mwahahaha laughter, then “Sascha Baron Cohen”:http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Slideshows/_production/ss_070115_goldenglobeWin/ss_070115_goldenglobewin_11.widec.jpg is a must, but I must admit that I think for smoldering intensity you couldn’t do better than “Rufus Sewell”:http://anyeventuality.files.wordpress.com/2006/04/helenoftroy.jpg.

The other big issue, for me, is Marcel Mauss. We want the sauve cosmopolitan with a touch of childish innocence and major writer’s block. I personally think Jude Law would be great, but then again, I think Jude Law would be great reading the phone book. Mohawk has suggest the Fiennes brothers for Durkheim/Mauss but I think it would be hard to beat Malkovitch, frankly. Sascha Baron Cohen would also be great, but only if he was willing to sign up for a ‘serious’ role. My final choice would have to be ROBERT DOWNEY JUNIOR. Zomg have you SEEN the Iron Man teaser trailer? RDJ and Malkovitch ftw!!!

We also have votes to have Wolverine play Bougle and a vote for Daniel Craig, who I definitely think should get in there somewhere. I also like the idea of having a few ‘teaser’ cameos for the sequel like having Orlando Bloom play a young Louis Dumont.

The issue of directing has come up. I must admit that I think Tarantino deserves a pass, and although I’m sure Shekhar Kapur is interested I think the rest of the world finally shares my negative opinion of his work. I guess its too late to suggest Robert Altman? If so, could someone get Ang Lee on the phone?

Keep the ideas coming folks.

Indigenous Voices 2007

I just came back from the Taiwan International Ethnographic Film Festival in Taipei. Because of teaching I was only able to attend the first three days of the five-day event, but that short time was jam-packed with ethnotastic cinematic excitement.

This year’s theme was “indigenous voices,” and one of the highlights of the festival were select productions by Video in the Villages. The biggest crowd pleaser was “Marangmotxingmo Mirang, From the Ikpeng Children to the World,” a video letter in which children take the camera for a tour of their village and their way of life, but the dramatic retelling of a traditional folktale in “Imbé Gikegü, The Smell of Pequi Fruit” was almost as much fun.
Continue reading

More Rouch on YouTube

When I read (on NewTeeVee) how Google Video had changed to become a search engine rather than just a place for Google to host its own video content, I thought of Strong’s post about Les Maîtres Fous and did a search for “Jean Rouch.” I was amazed at how much I discovered!

There is his famous “cinetrance” Les tambours d’avant Tourou et Bitti, as well as Hippopotamus Hunt : Battle on the Great River and Graveyards in the cliff. There are also some scenes from Petit à petit, and various interviews and discussions as well. Some of these are subtitled some are not. Who knows how long all this will be up there, so watch them while you can!

There are also a bunch of documentaries about Rouch (mostly from DER), like Rouch’s Gang which can be viewed for a small fee.

UPDATE: DER has a Jean Rouch tribute website.

(Disclaimer: DER also distributes a film I made.)

Mass-Observation

Another BBC video about an anthropologist discovered on YouTube. (See previous post on BBC & Youtube here.) This one, narrated by Sir. David Attenbourgh, is about Tom Harrisson, a rather eccentric figure in the history of anthropology:

He attended Pembroke College, Cambridge, where he neglected his studies in favour of drinking, fighting and walking the streets barefoot with red-painted toenails. Although he left in 1931 without obtaining a degree, he served as ornithologist on Oxford Society expeditions to St Kilda (1930), Norwegian Lapland (1931), Sarawak, (1932), and the New Hebrides (1934), where, rather than returning with the rest of the party, he went on alone to Malekula to spend time with its cannibal inhabitants and write the book Savage Civilisation defending their way of life. Harrisson was now more interested in watching people than birds, and attempted to apply similar ethnological methods to observing the inhabitants of Bolton, working in a mill and asking them questions about their daily lives. Along with Charles Madge and Humphrey Jennings, Harrisson founded Mass Observation, an organisation that attempted to use ethnological methods to study British society – an “anthropology of ourselves”. Soon, a network of volunteer ‘Mass Observers’ was reporting back on ordinary people’s experience of everything from sport and leisure to housing, the Police Force and the 1937 Coronation.

As the film says, Mass-Observation developed many of the techniques used in all market research today. Interestingly, we learn that at the age of 19 he organized a huge team of volunteer observers to study a single species of bird, skills that served him well with the nation-wide polling network he set up in the period before England joined the war. I’m sure Harrison would have loved YouTube.

Harrison is also interesting with regard to another theme we have discussed extensively on Savage Minds, the role of anthropology in wartime:

In 1942, Harrisson joined the Army. By 1945, he was working with the Special Operations Executive, and was parachuted behind Japanese lines into Borneo, where he recruited 1,000 native soldiers armed with blowpipes. This unique army gathered behind-the-lines intelligence, disrupted enemy supply lines and killed or captured some 1,500 Japanese troops in what must stand as one of the most unusual campaigns of World War II.

(Some of those “Japanese troops” were likely Taiwanese Aborigines.) Harrison was also a museum curator, amateur archaeologist, and filmmaker. He seems to have been somewhat patronizing towards those he worked with, both in Borneo and in England, but was nonetheless quite a fascinating character and a good subject for a film. A 1998 biography, The Most Offending Soul Alive: Tom Harrisson and His Remarkable Life, which formed the basis for this documentary, seems like a fun read.