Routledge copyright FUD rant

First, let me say that Routledge is to be congratulated for devising such an “ingeniously insouciant cover”:http://www.routledge.com/common/jackets/weblarge/041526/0415267498.jpg for their new ‘Routledge Classics’ edition of The Gift (for some reason I also find the cover of the Jung volume compelling in an inarticulate way). But I must say I’m pretty dismayed to see what happens when I try to ‘read more’ about the book. If you click on it you are taken to a “‘country of origin'”:https://ecommerce.tandf.co.uk/catalogue/DirectLink.asp?ResourceCentre=ROUTCLASSICS&ContinentSelected=0&CountrySelected=0&USSelected=0&ChangeCountry=0&search_text=041526748X&SearchGroup=PRISBN&results_order=ByTitle&domregion=us&Referrer=routledge-classics page where you must give them your physical location before they will show you anything about any of the books. Why? According to Routledge,

As a publisher we take copyright issues very seriously. Not all of our publications are available in all territories, and in addition we undertake to distribute other publishers [sic] product in some (but not all) territories. We use your location to ensure that we only display products which are available for purchase in your area.

The idea that copyright issues dictate you telling a website where you are from is just simply ridiculous. Copyright law is (newsflash) harmonized within the United States, so there is no need for me to tell Routledge where I’m from. Second, no one is violating any copyright law anywhere when they buy books in print abroad and have them shipped over to their house (although I admit, ianal, and there may be some weird ‘distribution’ thing going on. But I doubt it).

Routledge wants 1) metrics metrics metrics and 2) to get you to the right part of their ecommerce website. It is perfectly understandable that they should want both of these things. My point is not some Politech-like libertarian one about web privacy. My point is simply that Routledge is simply making information about their books 1 click farther away than it needs to be — in my case it was, as Richard Attenborough might put it, A Click Too Far. It’s also lamentable that copyright is the new liability when it comes to excuses that people turn to when they decide to do (or not do) something. Drives me up the wall I tell ya.

Ok, I’m done. Thanks for listening. I feel much better.

Rex

Alex Golub is an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. His book Leviathans at The Gold Mine has been published by Duke University Press. You can contact him at rex@savageminds.org

2 thoughts on “Routledge copyright FUD rant

  1. Pingback: English
  2. “I feel much better now.”

    cool. I yet worried. *smirk

    “.. you must give them your physical location before they will show you anything about any of the books. Why?”

    To me the more interesting question is, does the selection of content that is presented differ in dependancy of geographical or national locality [has anyone yet tried out to type in different localities?] and if yes, in which regards? [Sry, if having read over something that already answers my point.]

Comments are closed.