<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bronze age &#8211; Savage Minds</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/bronze-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2017 01:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>I think Princeton University Press kinda jumped the shark on this one</title>
		<link>/2014/04/02/i-think-princeton-university-press-kinda-jumped-the-shark-on-this-one/</link>
		<comments>/2014/04/02/i-think-princeton-university-press-kinda-jumped-the-shark-on-this-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronze age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princeton University Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university presses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m suspicious of for-profit journal publishers, but I like university presses. They are often value-driven, down on their heels, and plucky. When the death of publishing at the hands of The Digital was first announced, they were pretty depressed. But since then they&#8217;ve moved into ebooks, developed new ways to market their books, and have &#8230; <a href="/2014/04/02/i-think-princeton-university-press-kinda-jumped-the-shark-on-this-one/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">I think Princeton University Press kinda jumped the shark on this one</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m suspicious of for-profit journal publishers, but I like university presses. They are often value-driven, down on their heels, and plucky. When the death of publishing at the hands of The Digital was first announced, they were pretty depressed. But since then they&#8217;ve moved into ebooks, developed new ways to market their books, and have done a good job embracing the new.</p>
<p>Princeton is a good example of a large, (relatively) wealthy press with a lot of cultural capital that is looking for new ways to engage audiences. I think this &#8216;trailer&#8217; (yes, you read that right) for their new book <a href="http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10185.html">1177 B.C.</a> <em>just </em>stepped over the line. My favorite part is when the words &#8220;NO MORE MYCENEANS&#8221; start drifting towards you while the soundtrack from Lord of the Rings plays in the background.</p>
<p><iframe src="//player.vimeo.com/video/89306019" height="281" width="500" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/2014/04/02/i-think-princeton-university-press-kinda-jumped-the-shark-on-this-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
