<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Artificial Intelligence: Making AI in our Images</title>
	<atom:link href="/2017/09/07/artificial-intelligence-making-ai-in-our-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2017/09/07/artificial-intelligence-making-ai-in-our-images/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCreery</title>
		<link>/2017/09/07/artificial-intelligence-making-ai-in-our-images/comment-page-1/#comment-840322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John McCreery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 01:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=22184#comment-840322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sally, are you aware of the work of Grant Jun Otsuki, a Canadian-Japanese anthropologist who has been studying Japanese engineers working with humanoid robots, with particular reference to what makes a robot &quot;human&quot;? I heard him give a fascinating talk last year that, if my memory is correct, centered on the proposition that while North American engineers tend to see humanity as something internal, which leads to a focus on software &quot;inside&quot; the robot, the Japanese engineers take the position that if a robot can be human if it acts like a human. Their focus is on external interaction rather than internal software.

He also described an eerie instance of a robot being programmed to do something  that would ordinarily be entrusted to a human. In the wake of the Fukushima 1 nuclear disaster, a robot was programmed to enter the contaminated zone around the nuclear power plant and chant Buddhist sutras for the victims of the earthquake and tsunami that caused the disaster — a task that would normally be performed by a Buddhist priest.

Should you be interested in getting in touch with him: http://www.gjotsuki.net/

Note, however, that he has now left Tsukuba University in Japan and moved to New Zealand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sally, are you aware of the work of Grant Jun Otsuki, a Canadian-Japanese anthropologist who has been studying Japanese engineers working with humanoid robots, with particular reference to what makes a robot &#8220;human&#8221;? I heard him give a fascinating talk last year that, if my memory is correct, centered on the proposition that while North American engineers tend to see humanity as something internal, which leads to a focus on software &#8220;inside&#8221; the robot, the Japanese engineers take the position that if a robot can be human if it acts like a human. Their focus is on external interaction rather than internal software.</p>
<p>He also described an eerie instance of a robot being programmed to do something  that would ordinarily be entrusted to a human. In the wake of the Fukushima 1 nuclear disaster, a robot was programmed to enter the contaminated zone around the nuclear power plant and chant Buddhist sutras for the victims of the earthquake and tsunami that caused the disaster — a task that would normally be performed by a Buddhist priest.</p>
<p>Should you be interested in getting in touch with him: <a href="http://www.gjotsuki.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gjotsuki.net/</a></p>
<p>Note, however, that he has now left Tsukuba University in Japan and moved to New Zealand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
