<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Cultural Anthropologist Reads a Science Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="/2015/04/17/a-cultural-anthropologist-reads-a-science-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2015/04/17/a-cultural-anthropologist-reads-a-science-journal/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John hartigan</title>
		<link>/2015/04/17/a-cultural-anthropologist-reads-a-science-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-837328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John hartigan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=16732#comment-837328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, I hadn&#039;t seen it; great take, I&#039;ll use it in my next post. I have, though, been thinking through the Laland article in Nature that Downey cites: http://www.nature.com/news/does-evolutionary-theory-need-a-rethink-1.16080#/yes It&#039;s a major reference point for these questions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I hadn&#8217;t seen it; great take, I&#8217;ll use it in my next post. I have, though, been thinking through the Laland article in Nature that Downey cites: <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/does-evolutionary-theory-need-a-rethink-1.16080#/yes" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/news/does-evolutionary-theory-need-a-rethink-1.16080#/yes</a> It&#8217;s a major reference point for these questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmccreery</title>
		<link>/2015/04/17/a-cultural-anthropologist-reads-a-science-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-837322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnmccreery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 03:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=16732#comment-837322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#039;t seen it yet, this just in from Greg Downey at Neuroanthropology: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.plos.org/neuroanthropology/2015/04/19/plastics-and-human-evolution/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+plos%2Fblogs%2Fneuroanthropology+%28Blogs+-+Neuroanthropology%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Plastics, Tiny Penises and Human Evolution&lt;/a&gt;. Niche construction theory (NCT) seems like a very promising direction. The stuff about earthworms is particularly fascinating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen it yet, this just in from Greg Downey at Neuroanthropology: <a href="http://blogs.plos.org/neuroanthropology/2015/04/19/plastics-and-human-evolution/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+plos%2Fblogs%2Fneuroanthropology+%28Blogs+-+Neuroanthropology%29" rel="nofollow">Plastics, Tiny Penises and Human Evolution</a>. Niche construction theory (NCT) seems like a very promising direction. The stuff about earthworms is particularly fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmccreery</title>
		<link>/2015/04/17/a-cultural-anthropologist-reads-a-science-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-837315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnmccreery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 04:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=16732#comment-837315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More anthropologists should be reading science journals. Or if not journals at least online sources like &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.quantamagazine.org&quot;/ rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quanta&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://nautil.us&quot;/ rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nautilus&lt;/a&gt;. One thing that is striking and also very sad when I look back over the past view decades is how much science has moved on and how little most cultural anthropologists (at least those encountered online) seem to know about what&#039;s been going on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More anthropologists should be reading science journals. Or if not journals at least online sources like <a href="https://www.quantamagazine.org/" rel="nofollow">Quanta</a> or <a href="http://nautil.us/" rel="nofollow">Nautilus</a>. One thing that is striking and also very sad when I look back over the past view decades is how much science has moved on and how little most cultural anthropologists (at least those encountered online) seem to know about what&#8217;s been going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
