<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minority Report</title>
	<atom:link href="/2014/07/15/minority-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2014/07/15/minority-report/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celia</title>
		<link>/2014/07/15/minority-report/comment-page-1/#comment-820287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Celia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=11452#comment-820287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting. I sometimes wonder about the reverse. Through marriage, I could potentially take on a Latina name (e.g. Celia Gonzales) but without &#039;rights&#039; of ownership. Similarly, a friend of mine was invited to diversity weekend at an elite college--then the offer was rescinded when they realized that his &#039;African female&#039; name actually belonged to an unusual white male.

There are many studies that evaluate our impressions of faces and names, but none I know of that really differentiate what happens when a &quot;minority&quot; has a &quot;white&quot; name or when a &quot;white&quot; person has a &quot;minority&quot; name. Does it matter whether name or face comes first? Why do these two things matter so much? Does this &#039;mixed&#039; identity matter for diversity hiring, or among discriminatory hires? I have to imagine there are both setback and benefits--and many, many questions!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I sometimes wonder about the reverse. Through marriage, I could potentially take on a Latina name (e.g. Celia Gonzales) but without &#8216;rights&#8217; of ownership. Similarly, a friend of mine was invited to diversity weekend at an elite college&#8211;then the offer was rescinded when they realized that his &#8216;African female&#8217; name actually belonged to an unusual white male.</p>
<p>There are many studies that evaluate our impressions of faces and names, but none I know of that really differentiate what happens when a &#8220;minority&#8221; has a &#8220;white&#8221; name or when a &#8220;white&#8221; person has a &#8220;minority&#8221; name. Does it matter whether name or face comes first? Why do these two things matter so much? Does this &#8216;mixed&#8217; identity matter for diversity hiring, or among discriminatory hires? I have to imagine there are both setback and benefits&#8211;and many, many questions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
