<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anthropology: Five Books</title>
	<atom:link href="/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: An anthropology roundup. What were your landmark books? &#171; Erkan&#039;s Field Diary</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-782593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An anthropology roundup. What were your landmark books? &#171; Erkan&#039;s Field Diary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-782593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] year I posted an open thread called “Anthropology: Five Books,” in which I asked readers to list the five books they feel best represent the discipline.  The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] year I posted an open thread called “Anthropology: Five Books,” in which I asked readers to list the five books they feel best represent the discipline.  The [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthropology: The landmark books &#124; Savage Minds</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-777675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthropology: The landmark books &#124; Savage Minds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-777675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] year I posted an open thread called &#8220;Anthropology: Five Books,&#8221; in which I asked readers to list the five books they feel best represent the discipline.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] year I posted an open thread called &#8220;Anthropology: Five Books,&#8221; in which I asked readers to list the five books they feel best represent the discipline.  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mara</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-722562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-722562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Nicolas I would argue that Wade Davis is at least as problematic as Jarred Diamond. He&#039;s using his talent for writing in the most cunning way, and perpetuates the myth of the noble savage. Perhaps this is why he is the anthropologist of choice for National Geographic and TED.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Nicolas I would argue that Wade Davis is at least as problematic as Jarred Diamond. He&#8217;s using his talent for writing in the most cunning way, and perpetuates the myth of the noble savage. Perhaps this is why he is the anthropologist of choice for National Geographic and TED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCreery</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John McCreery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sean Dowdy - I&#039;ll second that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sean Dowdy &#8211; I&#8217;ll second that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bree</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sean Dowdy - beautiful selection!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sean Dowdy &#8211; beautiful selection!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything by Wade Davis
Beyond the Milky Way - Gerardo Reichel-Dolmatoff (Eastern Tukanos)
Les Indiens Kogis: La memoire des possibles - Tag name eric julien
The Art of Tantra - Philip Rawson (not an anthgist but interesting)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything by Wade Davis<br />
Beyond the Milky Way &#8211; Gerardo Reichel-Dolmatoff (Eastern Tukanos)<br />
Les Indiens Kogis: La memoire des possibles &#8211; Tag name eric julien<br />
The Art of Tantra &#8211; Philip Rawson (not an anthgist but interesting)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Dowdy</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Dowdy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some that haven&#039;t made it to the list, but have always stood out for me...

As I see it, accessibility qua good story-telling is an excellent way to show what anthropology is capable of.  Ergo, my list (for socio-cultural anthro, at least):

(1) Edmund Leach, &lt;i&gt;Political Systems of Highland Burma&lt;/i&gt; 
(2) Victor Turner, &lt;i&gt;Schism and Continuity in an African Society&lt;/i&gt;
(3) Marshall Sahlins, &lt;i&gt;Historical Metaphors, Mythical Realities&lt;/i&gt;
(4) Claude Lévi-Strauss &lt;i&gt;The Story of Lynx&lt;/i&gt;
(5) Ruth Benedict, &lt;i&gt;Chrysanthemum and the Sword&lt;/i&gt;

and for good measure...

Franz Boas, &quot;The Study of Geography&quot; and &quot;On Alternating Sounds&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some that haven&#8217;t made it to the list, but have always stood out for me&#8230;</p>
<p>As I see it, accessibility qua good story-telling is an excellent way to show what anthropology is capable of.  Ergo, my list (for socio-cultural anthro, at least):</p>
<p>(1) Edmund Leach, <i>Political Systems of Highland Burma</i><br />
(2) Victor Turner, <i>Schism and Continuity in an African Society</i><br />
(3) Marshall Sahlins, <i>Historical Metaphors, Mythical Realities</i><br />
(4) Claude Lévi-Strauss <i>The Story of Lynx</i><br />
(5) Ruth Benedict, <i>Chrysanthemum and the Sword</i></p>
<p>and for good measure&#8230;</p>
<p>Franz Boas, &#8220;The Study of Geography&#8221; and &#8220;On Alternating Sounds&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Greenough</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen Greenough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some that aren&#039;t on the list already:
Going way back to the tentative beginning of anthropology, Mary Kingsley&#039;s Travels in West Africa is long but very accessible.  It gives a view of a time before cultural relativity, and must be read with that understanding.  It&#039;s a bit more travelogue than ethnography, but a chapter in the latter part of the book gives a peek into her ethnological studies that is fascinating.  She studies &quot;fetishes&quot; as well as fish.
Mules and Men, Zora Neale Hurston ... I&#039;m sure that she has other great books, but I&#039;ve just started to read her.
In Sorcery&#039;s Shadow, Paul Stoller and Cheryl Olkes ... more of a memoir than an ethnography, but it&#039;s one of the first things I read that got me interested in anthropology.  (Fusion of the Worlds:  An Ethnography of Possession Among the Songhay of Niger is Stoller&#039;s ethnography from that time.)
Thunder rides a black horse : Mescalero Apaches and the mythic present, Claire R. Farrer
Western Apache Language and Culture: Essays in Linguistic Anthropology, Keith. H. Basso]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some that aren&#8217;t on the list already:<br />
Going way back to the tentative beginning of anthropology, Mary Kingsley&#8217;s Travels in West Africa is long but very accessible.  It gives a view of a time before cultural relativity, and must be read with that understanding.  It&#8217;s a bit more travelogue than ethnography, but a chapter in the latter part of the book gives a peek into her ethnological studies that is fascinating.  She studies &#8220;fetishes&#8221; as well as fish.<br />
Mules and Men, Zora Neale Hurston &#8230; I&#8217;m sure that she has other great books, but I&#8217;ve just started to read her.<br />
In Sorcery&#8217;s Shadow, Paul Stoller and Cheryl Olkes &#8230; more of a memoir than an ethnography, but it&#8217;s one of the first things I read that got me interested in anthropology.  (Fusion of the Worlds:  An Ethnography of Possession Among the Songhay of Niger is Stoller&#8217;s ethnography from that time.)<br />
Thunder rides a black horse : Mescalero Apaches and the mythic present, Claire R. Farrer<br />
Western Apache Language and Culture: Essays in Linguistic Anthropology, Keith. H. Basso</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCreery</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John McCreery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tony

For Japan — Dorinne Kondo&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Crafting Selves&lt;/i&gt; and Theodore Bestor&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Tsukiji:The Fish Market at the Center of the World&lt;/i&gt;.

For China — Ellen Oxfeld&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Blood, Sweat, and Mahjong: Family and Enterprise in an Overseas Chinese Community&lt;/i&gt; and Aiwha Ong &lt;i&gt;Flexible Citizenship&lt;/i&gt;.

Ong&#039;s prose can be a bit postmodern. But what all four of these books have in common is the use of ethnography to illuminate global issues, who we tell ourselves we are(Kondo), what we eat and where it comes from (Bestor), what it means to be an &quot;us&quot; in others&#039; place (Oxfeld), and how legal and cultural identities, class and country intersect to make the world a global field on which cosmopolitans play (Ong). 

It is not, I think, accidental that three of the authors are women. Two are at least bicultural (Kondo, Japanese-American and Ong Malaysian-Chinese) and the third, Oxfeld, is an American Jew who married a Bengali man, conducted her initial research on a Hakka (Chinese minority) community in Calcutta and has followed its members both back to its founders home in China and, for some of them, their new home in Toronto. As an example of anthropology thoroughly involved in the modern world, it is hard to imagine a better example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony</p>
<p>For Japan — Dorinne Kondo&#8217;s <i>Crafting Selves</i> and Theodore Bestor&#8217;s <i>Tsukiji:The Fish Market at the Center of the World</i>.</p>
<p>For China — Ellen Oxfeld&#8217;s <i>Blood, Sweat, and Mahjong: Family and Enterprise in an Overseas Chinese Community</i> and Aiwha Ong <i>Flexible Citizenship</i>.</p>
<p>Ong&#8217;s prose can be a bit postmodern. But what all four of these books have in common is the use of ethnography to illuminate global issues, who we tell ourselves we are(Kondo), what we eat and where it comes from (Bestor), what it means to be an &#8220;us&#8221; in others&#8217; place (Oxfeld), and how legal and cultural identities, class and country intersect to make the world a global field on which cosmopolitans play (Ong). </p>
<p>It is not, I think, accidental that three of the authors are women. Two are at least bicultural (Kondo, Japanese-American and Ong Malaysian-Chinese) and the third, Oxfeld, is an American Jew who married a Bengali man, conducted her initial research on a Hakka (Chinese minority) community in Calcutta and has followed its members both back to its founders home in China and, for some of them, their new home in Toronto. As an example of anthropology thoroughly involved in the modern world, it is hard to imagine a better example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, a wonderful post. Considering the difficulties of choosing only 5, I will list the ones I like the most regarding teaching purposes (undergraduate &#038; postgraduate), and with a special *bias* since they are translated in Spanish –mostly classics and ethnographically oriented.   

- El cultivo de la tierra y los ritos agrícolas en las islas Trobriand.  Los jardines de coral y su magia (B. Malinowski)*
[Coral Gardens and Their Magic (…)] *ok, ‘Baloma’ as well 

- Un pueblo de la Sierra, Grazalema (J. Pitt-Rivers) 
[The people of the Sierra]

- Brujería, magia y oráculos entre los azande (E.E. Evans-Pritchard) 
[Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande]

- Ensayo sobre el don. La forma y la razón del intercambio en las sociedades arcaicas (M. Mauss) 
[Essai sur le don (…)] 

- Hacia una teoría antropológica del Valor. La moneda falsa de nuestros sueños  (D. Graeber) –my translation: forthcoming!
[Toward An Anthropological Theory of Value (…)]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, a wonderful post. Considering the difficulties of choosing only 5, I will list the ones I like the most regarding teaching purposes (undergraduate &amp; postgraduate), and with a special *bias* since they are translated in Spanish –mostly classics and ethnographically oriented.   </p>
<p>&#8211; El cultivo de la tierra y los ritos agrícolas en las islas Trobriand.  Los jardines de coral y su magia (B. Malinowski)*<br />
[Coral Gardens and Their Magic (…)] *ok, ‘Baloma’ as well </p>
<p>&#8211; Un pueblo de la Sierra, Grazalema (J. Pitt-Rivers)<br />
[The people of the Sierra]</p>
<p>&#8211; Brujería, magia y oráculos entre los azande (E.E. Evans-Pritchard)<br />
[Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande]</p>
<p>&#8211; Ensayo sobre el don. La forma y la razón del intercambio en las sociedades arcaicas (M. Mauss)<br />
[Essai sur le don (…)] </p>
<p>&#8211; Hacia una teoría antropológica del Valor. La moneda falsa de nuestros sueños  (D. Graeber) –my translation: forthcoming!<br />
[Toward An Anthropological Theory of Value (…)]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Waters</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Waters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@John--Ok, so what would you recommend about east Asia?
For the archaeologists, what about Stephen LeBlanc Constant Battles?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John&#8211;Ok, so what would you recommend about east Asia?<br />
For the archaeologists, what about Stephen LeBlanc Constant Battles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 23:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for all the great comments and book lists everyone!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the great comments and book lists everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@John McCreery

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily a geographic focus for everyone. The only one I put geographically related to the region I study is Sweetness and Power, which I would have put regardless of whether my interests were in the Caribbean or elsewhere. I do think there is a tie to research interests though, not knowing what anyone else on here studies specifically, I know I can say that all of mine are related to environmental anthropology.

As for the lack of emphasis on social anthropology, though I do count more than just the one reference to Radcliffe-Brown, (I also see two Malinowski works and Evans-Pritchard) I think it has more to do with accessibility. Some of those older books can be difficult to read without a theoretical or historical background of anthropology to place them in context. 

A few of the books are what I would personally consider new, or newer, classics. Sweetness and Power, Wisdom Sits in Places, and Debt are all powerful books with huge theoretical implications outside of a strict definition of culture.

Depending on how you define South or East Asia, to cover that region, I would happily swap Seeing Like a State with The Art of Not Being Governed by the same author in my own, personal list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John McCreery</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily a geographic focus for everyone. The only one I put geographically related to the region I study is Sweetness and Power, which I would have put regardless of whether my interests were in the Caribbean or elsewhere. I do think there is a tie to research interests though, not knowing what anyone else on here studies specifically, I know I can say that all of mine are related to environmental anthropology.</p>
<p>As for the lack of emphasis on social anthropology, though I do count more than just the one reference to Radcliffe-Brown, (I also see two Malinowski works and Evans-Pritchard) I think it has more to do with accessibility. Some of those older books can be difficult to read without a theoretical or historical background of anthropology to place them in context. </p>
<p>A few of the books are what I would personally consider new, or newer, classics. Sweetness and Power, Wisdom Sits in Places, and Debt are all powerful books with huge theoretical implications outside of a strict definition of culture.</p>
<p>Depending on how you define South or East Asia, to cover that region, I would happily swap Seeing Like a State with The Art of Not Being Governed by the same author in my own, personal list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCreery</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John McCreery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huge thanks to Ryan for starting this thread, and to everyone who has contributed. I am fascinated by the diversity of work being cited. At the same time, I observe a strong concentration on the Americas. Nothing so far on South or East Asia. Also a notable lack, except for one recommendation of Radcliffe-Brown, of classic social anthropology, with analysis grounded in local social structure. I find myself wondering how much people read outside their particular geographical and theoretical focus?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huge thanks to Ryan for starting this thread, and to everyone who has contributed. I am fascinated by the diversity of work being cited. At the same time, I observe a strong concentration on the Americas. Nothing so far on South or East Asia. Also a notable lack, except for one recommendation of Radcliffe-Brown, of classic social anthropology, with analysis grounded in local social structure. I find myself wondering how much people read outside their particular geographical and theoretical focus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mara</title>
		<link>/2012/03/10/anthropology-five-books/comment-page-1/#comment-721010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7288#comment-721010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[these are the 5 books that (in my own, subjective view) should tell larger audiences what anthropology is all about. Word of caution, though, no old school anthropology here: 

Michael Taussig (1991) Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing
Michael Taussig (2004) My Cocaine Museum
Alan Klima (2002) The Funeral Casino: Meditation, Massacre, and Exchange with the Dead in Thailand
Steven Gregory (2006) The Devil behind the Mirror Globalization and Politics in the Dominican Republic
Sabrina C. Agarwal and Bonnie N. Glencross (2011) Social Bioarchaeology]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these are the 5 books that (in my own, subjective view) should tell larger audiences what anthropology is all about. Word of caution, though, no old school anthropology here: </p>
<p>Michael Taussig (1991) Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing<br />
Michael Taussig (2004) My Cocaine Museum<br />
Alan Klima (2002) The Funeral Casino: Meditation, Massacre, and Exchange with the Dead in Thailand<br />
Steven Gregory (2006) The Devil behind the Mirror Globalization and Politics in the Dominican Republic<br />
Sabrina C. Agarwal and Bonnie N. Glencross (2011) Social Bioarchaeology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
