<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kate Clancy: Three Lessons</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/10/08/kate-clancy-three-lessons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2011/10/08/kate-clancy-three-lessons/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clara B. Jones</title>
		<link>/2011/10/08/kate-clancy-three-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-708309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clara B. Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6198#comment-708309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I consider Kate Clancy to be a significant phenomenon among American female bloggers, second only, perhaps, to Ree Drummond (The Pioneer Woman) in number of followers. Clancy advances a novel model of feminism whereby commitment to &quot;radical&quot; change (in her case, changing centralized, elitist, patriarchical, and hierarchical academic networks) is combined with MAINSTREAM scholarship. It is important for young female academics to study Clancy&#039;s model for its possible utility in their own lives. It is, also, important for them to hear John Hawke&#039;s caveat in his reply to Clancy&#039;s blogpost that you link above: PUBLICATION is the way to scholarly independence and, one might add, to the recognition in their disciplines that these young women urgently wish to attain. I have created a running blogpost, The Clancy Effect, that some may find of interest. Though I applaud Clancy&#039;s messages and her earnestness, my comments represent my personal analysis and are not devoid of criticism.

Blog: http://vertebratesocialbehavior.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/cbjones1943]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider Kate Clancy to be a significant phenomenon among American female bloggers, second only, perhaps, to Ree Drummond (The Pioneer Woman) in number of followers. Clancy advances a novel model of feminism whereby commitment to &#8220;radical&#8221; change (in her case, changing centralized, elitist, patriarchical, and hierarchical academic networks) is combined with MAINSTREAM scholarship. It is important for young female academics to study Clancy&#8217;s model for its possible utility in their own lives. It is, also, important for them to hear John Hawke&#8217;s caveat in his reply to Clancy&#8217;s blogpost that you link above: PUBLICATION is the way to scholarly independence and, one might add, to the recognition in their disciplines that these young women urgently wish to attain. I have created a running blogpost, The Clancy Effect, that some may find of interest. Though I applaud Clancy&#8217;s messages and her earnestness, my comments represent my personal analysis and are not devoid of criticism.</p>
<p>Blog: <a href="http://vertebratesocialbehavior.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://vertebratesocialbehavior.blogspot.com/</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/cbjones1943" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/cbjones1943</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
