<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illustrated Man, #7 &#8211; Shane, the Lone Ethnographer</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/08/18/illustrated-man-7-shane-the-lone-ethnographer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2011/08/18/illustrated-man-7-shane-the-lone-ethnographer/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>/2011/08/18/illustrated-man-7-shane-the-lone-ethnographer/comment-page-1/#comment-707429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5895#comment-707429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There have to be standards, sure — research has rules and I’m not advocating a free-for-all abandonment of method — but we need to challenge it in measured, complex and varied ways. One of the best ways of doing that is to question what “counts” as scholarship.&quot;

Agreed.  That&#039;s a pretty important question and I hope more people keep pushing the point on this.  I think things need to open up a bit--and this includes alternative ways of publishing and presenting anthropology (films, etc).  I definitely think it&#039;s really important to think more about what counts, who makes that decision, and what that means in the grand scheme of things.

Great post.  Sorry for lagging on posting a comment--I meant to write something a few days ago...but you know how it goes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There have to be standards, sure — research has rules and I’m not advocating a free-for-all abandonment of method — but we need to challenge it in measured, complex and varied ways. One of the best ways of doing that is to question what “counts” as scholarship.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed.  That&#8217;s a pretty important question and I hope more people keep pushing the point on this.  I think things need to open up a bit&#8211;and this includes alternative ways of publishing and presenting anthropology (films, etc).  I definitely think it&#8217;s really important to think more about what counts, who makes that decision, and what that means in the grand scheme of things.</p>
<p>Great post.  Sorry for lagging on posting a comment&#8211;I meant to write something a few days ago&#8230;but you know how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
