<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pesky process books</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/10/25/pesky-process-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2010/10/25/pesky-process-books/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCreery</title>
		<link>/2010/10/25/pesky-process-books/comment-page-1/#comment-668577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John McCreery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4413#comment-668577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on, Rex. If everything were already reduced to bullet points, folks like us wouldn&#039;t have anything to do. 

On a more serious note, I remember being annoyed when I first read Vic Turner&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Forest of Symbols&lt;/i&gt; by how much the articles seemed to repeat each other. It has taken me a while to realize that what those articles are is an invaluable record of how Turner&#039;s ideas developed as he tried them out on different sets of data and noticed new things in what the data were showing him. I&#039;d love to teach or take a seminar in which we worked our way through the book, tracing the process by which his ideas evolved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Rex. If everything were already reduced to bullet points, folks like us wouldn&#8217;t have anything to do. </p>
<p>On a more serious note, I remember being annoyed when I first read Vic Turner&#8217;s <i>Forest of Symbols</i> by how much the articles seemed to repeat each other. It has taken me a while to realize that what those articles are is an invaluable record of how Turner&#8217;s ideas developed as he tried them out on different sets of data and noticed new things in what the data were showing him. I&#8217;d love to teach or take a seminar in which we worked our way through the book, tracing the process by which his ideas evolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
