<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Around the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/08/15/around-the-web-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2010/08/15/around-the-web-40/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>/2010/08/15/around-the-web-40/comment-page-1/#comment-649575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4001#comment-649575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that video. Very funny. I&#039;ve been showing it around.  I imagine that scholars and some archaeologists are just as full of shit when they talk about the past with conviction on the Discovery Channel.  I always thought it would be a little to easy to sham as a paleontologist: &quot;Yeah, the archaoloapelatasorosis was really pink with feathers and it raised it&#039;s young.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that video. Very funny. I&#8217;ve been showing it around.  I imagine that scholars and some archaeologists are just as full of shit when they talk about the past with conviction on the Discovery Channel.  I always thought it would be a little to easy to sham as a paleontologist: &#8220;Yeah, the archaoloapelatasorosis was really pink with feathers and it raised it&#8217;s young.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>/2010/08/15/around-the-web-40/comment-page-1/#comment-649510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4001#comment-649510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome background, thanks Ryan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome background, thanks Ryan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan a</title>
		<link>/2010/08/15/around-the-web-40/comment-page-1/#comment-649494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4001#comment-649494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I only wish they had communicated more contextual information about where this graffiti is as the power of the art stems not only from its imagery but from significance of its location as well.&quot;

A lot of this art comes from groups that are really active in and around Oaxaca City.  As the link states, much of this protest art stems from the violence and social unrest that took place starting around 2006.  There was a huge reaction against the government, specifically governor URO (Ulises Ruiz Ortiz), who many claimed took office under fraudulent circumstances in 2004.  In 2006 there were violent clashes between the government and Section 22 of the SNTE (teachers union), in what initially started out as a protest about teacher&#039;s salaries.  The teachers protested, and the government reacted by trying to forcefully remove them.  Other groups joined the teachers in protest, resulting in a pretty substantial political conflict.  Of course, it was anything but a clear-cut political issue.  When I was there during the summers of 2007-2008, the streets were filled with all kinds of social and political art/graffiti, from the kind of work pictured above to murals, stencils, and spray painted political epithets and messages.  There was a good amount of media coverage about these events.  Check out the March 2007 issue of Anthropology News for some short articles by Ron Waterbury, Lynn Stephen, and Deborah Poole.  I think that Kristin Norget may have written about some of this as well in a 2009 article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I only wish they had communicated more contextual information about where this graffiti is as the power of the art stems not only from its imagery but from significance of its location as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>A lot of this art comes from groups that are really active in and around Oaxaca City.  As the link states, much of this protest art stems from the violence and social unrest that took place starting around 2006.  There was a huge reaction against the government, specifically governor URO (Ulises Ruiz Ortiz), who many claimed took office under fraudulent circumstances in 2004.  In 2006 there were violent clashes between the government and Section 22 of the SNTE (teachers union), in what initially started out as a protest about teacher&#8217;s salaries.  The teachers protested, and the government reacted by trying to forcefully remove them.  Other groups joined the teachers in protest, resulting in a pretty substantial political conflict.  Of course, it was anything but a clear-cut political issue.  When I was there during the summers of 2007-2008, the streets were filled with all kinds of social and political art/graffiti, from the kind of work pictured above to murals, stencils, and spray painted political epithets and messages.  There was a good amount of media coverage about these events.  Check out the March 2007 issue of Anthropology News for some short articles by Ron Waterbury, Lynn Stephen, and Deborah Poole.  I think that Kristin Norget may have written about some of this as well in a 2009 article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>/2010/08/15/around-the-web-40/comment-page-1/#comment-649429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4001#comment-649429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mostly I just try to keep things current, whatever happens that week I put it up -- more like news. If people are interested in more themed columns please let me know. Also if you&#039;ve got good links, send &#039;em to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostly I just try to keep things current, whatever happens that week I put it up &#8212; more like news. If people are interested in more themed columns please let me know. Also if you&#8217;ve got good links, send &#8217;em to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>/2010/08/15/around-the-web-40/comment-page-1/#comment-649317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4001#comment-649317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i know that in some places in America &quot;biological anthropology&quot; is still a branch of anthropology (in other countries not so much, and in the US too, at least one bio anthro wing I know has split, claiming they were doing &quot;real science&quot; unlike socio-cultural anthropologists), but does it have to be 40% of the &quot;around the web&quot; column every week? Is there nothing else going on?
and is there no critical eye when we report about evolution and monkeys?
Sorry, but I really miss those old &quot;around the web&quot; posts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know that in some places in America &#8220;biological anthropology&#8221; is still a branch of anthropology (in other countries not so much, and in the US too, at least one bio anthro wing I know has split, claiming they were doing &#8220;real science&#8221; unlike socio-cultural anthropologists), but does it have to be 40% of the &#8220;around the web&#8221; column every week? Is there nothing else going on?<br />
and is there no critical eye when we report about evolution and monkeys?<br />
Sorry, but I really miss those old &#8220;around the web&#8221; posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
