<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcing the redesigned SLA website</title>
	<atom:link href="/2008/02/13/announcing-the-redesigned-sla-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2008/02/13/announcing-the-redesigned-sla-website/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>/2008/02/13/announcing-the-redesigned-sla-website/comment-page-1/#comment-213787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2008/02/13/announcing-the-redesigned-sla-website/#comment-213787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I very much agree with @next time. The pages are simple and functional, which make them beautiful. No nonsense, uninformative media and the reader knows where to find what without guessing.

I wish more pages were like that. Good work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much agree with @next time. The pages are simple and functional, which make them beautiful. No nonsense, uninformative media and the reader knows where to find what without guessing.</p>
<p>I wish more pages were like that. Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerim</title>
		<link>/2008/02/13/announcing-the-redesigned-sla-website/comment-page-1/#comment-213487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2008/02/13/announcing-the-redesigned-sla-website/#comment-213487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@next time. Thanks. I hope those were some good sandwiches!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@next time. Thanks. I hope those were some good sandwiches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: next time</title>
		<link>/2008/02/13/announcing-the-redesigned-sla-website/comment-page-1/#comment-213396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[next time]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2008/02/13/announcing-the-redesigned-sla-website/#comment-213396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kerim, it&#039;s beautiful.  And by beautiful, I mean it doesn&#039;t look all corporate and expensive and hence scary.  It looks like an academic website should look.  It&#039;s functional.  It doesn&#039;t have pictures of happy people skipping through meadows of wildflowers like a pharmaceutical company&#039;s website.  And it was free.  

Can I tell you a little secret?  I&#039;m not going to sign my name on this one because it&#039;s probably not a secret I should tell.  In the last place where I was employed, a sort of medical-organization that we work with collaboratively got a grant from a big name Foundation to revamp a medical information website that we ran.  The grant was for $400,000.  We -- I mean me and the other people who ran the website and maintained it on a daily basis by adding new stuff and keeping it updated and hence useful -- got none of that money.  Well, actually, there was a meeting with sandwiches and they might have paid for the sandwiches.  It all went... I don&#039;t know where, but I think most of it went to the dumbass company that redid the website.  And in the end it was no more functional, in my opinion, than the previous ugly but functional website.  All that $400,000 bought was spent on giving it a slick new corporate look that makes it look like it&#039;s sponsored by a pharmaceutical company (even though it&#039;s not) and probably scares people off.  

Can you believe the money people waste on stuff?  Couldn&#039;t that $400K have been better spent buying mosquito nets or something for places where people die of malaria?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerim, it&#8217;s beautiful.  And by beautiful, I mean it doesn&#8217;t look all corporate and expensive and hence scary.  It looks like an academic website should look.  It&#8217;s functional.  It doesn&#8217;t have pictures of happy people skipping through meadows of wildflowers like a pharmaceutical company&#8217;s website.  And it was free.  </p>
<p>Can I tell you a little secret?  I&#8217;m not going to sign my name on this one because it&#8217;s probably not a secret I should tell.  In the last place where I was employed, a sort of medical-organization that we work with collaboratively got a grant from a big name Foundation to revamp a medical information website that we ran.  The grant was for $400,000.  We &#8212; I mean me and the other people who ran the website and maintained it on a daily basis by adding new stuff and keeping it updated and hence useful &#8212; got none of that money.  Well, actually, there was a meeting with sandwiches and they might have paid for the sandwiches.  It all went&#8230; I don&#8217;t know where, but I think most of it went to the dumbass company that redid the website.  And in the end it was no more functional, in my opinion, than the previous ugly but functional website.  All that $400,000 bought was spent on giving it a slick new corporate look that makes it look like it&#8217;s sponsored by a pharmaceutical company (even though it&#8217;s not) and probably scares people off.  </p>
<p>Can you believe the money people waste on stuff?  Couldn&#8217;t that $400K have been better spent buying mosquito nets or something for places where people die of malaria?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
