<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anthropology (and archaeology) on Citizendium</title>
	<atom:link href="/2007/03/26/anthropology-and-archaeology-on-citizendium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2007/03/26/anthropology-and-archaeology-on-citizendium/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>/2007/03/26/anthropology-and-archaeology-on-citizendium/comment-page-1/#comment-81298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2007/03/26/anthropology-and-archaeology-on-citizendium/#comment-81298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please do join up!  I&#039;m one of those few people who have been working on the anthropology articles at Citizendium, but it&#039;s lonely out there and we need help to reach the potential that this project has already begun to demonstrate.

In reply to Vincent, your concerns are pretty common, but I encourage you to give it a try and see if you still feel the same after a little experience.  The incorporation of experts helps to ensure a higher level of quality and reliability, but their role is not to lock anyone out of the process. Their role is to encourage and guide the work of others (and each other) toward excellence. If an expert refuses to step out of the ivory tower and mingle with the masses, then there really isn&#039;t room for him or her at Citizendium.

(Apologies for such a late reply - I&#039;ve just come across this post.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do join up!  I&#8217;m one of those few people who have been working on the anthropology articles at Citizendium, but it&#8217;s lonely out there and we need help to reach the potential that this project has already begun to demonstrate.</p>
<p>In reply to Vincent, your concerns are pretty common, but I encourage you to give it a try and see if you still feel the same after a little experience.  The incorporation of experts helps to ensure a higher level of quality and reliability, but their role is not to lock anyone out of the process. Their role is to encourage and guide the work of others (and each other) toward excellence. If an expert refuses to step out of the ivory tower and mingle with the masses, then there really isn&#8217;t room for him or her at Citizendium.</p>
<p>(Apologies for such a late reply &#8211; I&#8217;ve just come across this post.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>/2007/03/26/anthropology-and-archaeology-on-citizendium/comment-page-1/#comment-62747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2007/03/26/anthropology-and-archaeology-on-citizendium/#comment-62747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eeeeeeh... I&#039;m going to do the kneejerk and say I don&#039;t really like the concept of this website. I&#039;d rather have the politicking of Wikipedia than elitism that we can get our daily dosage from E. Britannica, anyways. It seems like this &#039;pedia is redundant and obliquely based on a criticism that is, in a word, whiny: &quot;Stop rattling our ivory tower, you filthy wikipedian hooligans!&quot;

I love how their logo has a key. Don&#039;t have a degree? Try picking THIS lock, then. 

It seems to go against the fundamental spirit of this open access movement that&#039;s sweeping over anthropology.

But, eh, I&#039;m probably judging. We&#039;ll see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eeeeeeh&#8230; I&#8217;m going to do the kneejerk and say I don&#8217;t really like the concept of this website. I&#8217;d rather have the politicking of Wikipedia than elitism that we can get our daily dosage from E. Britannica, anyways. It seems like this &#8216;pedia is redundant and obliquely based on a criticism that is, in a word, whiny: &#8220;Stop rattling our ivory tower, you filthy wikipedian hooligans!&#8221;</p>
<p>I love how their logo has a key. Don&#8217;t have a degree? Try picking THIS lock, then. </p>
<p>It seems to go against the fundamental spirit of this open access movement that&#8217;s sweeping over anthropology.</p>
<p>But, eh, I&#8217;m probably judging. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
