<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retroboasians and Antiretroboasians</title>
	<atom:link href="/2006/09/25/retroboasians-and-antiretroboasians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2006/09/25/retroboasians-and-antiretroboasians/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJN</title>
		<link>/2006/09/25/retroboasians-and-antiretroboasians/comment-page-1/#comment-31501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TJN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/09/25/retroboasians-and-antiretroboasians/#comment-31501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rex,
I also have to admit to only a cursory reading of Verdon. I also count myself a neoBoasian. But in my biased and perhaps underinformed opinion Verdon focuses on only a small and unrepresentative sample of Boas&#039; ethnographic work. And I&#039;m not sure that its a matter of there being a gallic edge to this opposition, after all in the same AA issue Bunzl intertwines Boas and Foucault.
Hey, why &quot;retroBoasians&quot;? Now, R-B and The Andaman Islanders--thats retro!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex,<br />
I also have to admit to only a cursory reading of Verdon. I also count myself a neoBoasian. But in my biased and perhaps underinformed opinion Verdon focuses on only a small and unrepresentative sample of Boas&#8217; ethnographic work. And I&#8217;m not sure that its a matter of there being a gallic edge to this opposition, after all in the same AA issue Bunzl intertwines Boas and Foucault.<br />
Hey, why &#8220;retroBoasians&#8221;? Now, R-B and The Andaman Islanders&#8211;thats retro!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
