<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://organizeseries.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did you mean &#8220;matrilineal&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sybil amber</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-17445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sybil amber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-17445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes, thank you for this very useful project. i´ve lost my .dic´s so often, because of known windows setup and re - setup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, thank you for this very useful project. i´ve lost my .dic´s so often, because of known windows setup and re &#8211; setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-16318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-16318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not just &quot;patrilineal&quot; that is frustrating with MS Word, but grammar. Having grown up in the British system, I still apply older rules of grammar when writing. But of late, I have noticed jounral publications coming out with obvious Americanisms. Is this in part a product of MS Word? What MS Word &quot;tells&quot; me is not only my age, hanging onto out-of-date syntax, but that I am &quot;out&quot; of the language loop. Very frustrating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just &#8220;patrilineal&#8221; that is frustrating with MS Word, but grammar. Having grown up in the British system, I still apply older rules of grammar when writing. But of late, I have noticed jounral publications coming out with obvious Americanisms. Is this in part a product of MS Word? What MS Word &#8220;tells&#8221; me is not only my age, hanging onto out-of-date syntax, but that I am &#8220;out&#8221; of the language loop. Very frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerim</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-15833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-15833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea is to have a list of academic jargon that everyone can use, so it should be in English.

I\&#039;d be willing to host lists in other languages on my wiki if there is an interest in doing so - but the idea is academic terms, not terms specific to your fieldwork.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea is to have a list of academic jargon that everyone can use, so it should be in English.</p>
<p>I\&#8217;d be willing to host lists in other languages on my wiki if there is an interest in doing so &#8211; but the idea is academic terms, not terms specific to your fieldwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comet Jo</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-15764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comet Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-15764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[or should I say, kastom dictionaries ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or should I say, kastom dictionaries &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comet Jo</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-15763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comet Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-15763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one problem I see with this is that most of our customd dictionaries probably also contain vast lists of words in our areal languages that might (especially cumulatively) impede the ability of the dictionary to catch typos--do you want such word lists, or would you prefer them edited to exclude non english words?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one problem I see with this is that most of our customd dictionaries probably also contain vast lists of words in our areal languages that might (especially cumulatively) impede the ability of the dictionary to catch typos&#8211;do you want such word lists, or would you prefer them edited to exclude non english words?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerim</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-15679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 05:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-15679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using a wiki is easy - just hit the &quot;edit&quot; tab at the top of the screen and type away. When done, save your changes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a wiki is easy &#8211; just hit the &#8220;edit&#8221; tab at the top of the screen and type away. When done, save your changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grad Student Guy</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-15567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grad Student Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-15567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ignore the grammar mistakes in the last sentence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignore the grammar mistakes in the last sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grad Student Guy</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-15565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grad Student Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-15565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some strange reason the word globalized is not in their dictionary (despite it being such a common word). You would think after all of the discussions of the &quot;globalized world&quot; in the media that it would be there.  

Most words beginning with neo such as neoliberalism or neotraditionalism are also not in the dictionary as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some strange reason the word globalized is not in their dictionary (despite it being such a common word). You would think after all of the discussions of the &#8220;globalized world&#8221; in the media that it would be there.  </p>
<p>Most words beginning with neo such as neoliberalism or neotraditionalism are also not in the dictionary as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Todd Ormsbee</title>
		<link>/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/comment-page-1/#comment-15533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Todd Ormsbee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/2006/07/21/did-you-mean-matrilineal/#comment-15533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if anthropologists do much with political economic theory, but &quot;commodify&quot; and &quot;commodification&quot; are rejected by MS Word, and it suggests the grating &quot;commoditize&quot; and &quot;commoditization&quot; (which are common in American business English). [sorry for posting this here; I&#039;ve never used a wiki before.]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if anthropologists do much with political economic theory, but &#8220;commodify&#8221; and &#8220;commodification&#8221; are rejected by MS Word, and it suggests the grating &#8220;commoditize&#8221; and &#8220;commoditization&#8221; (which are common in American business English). [sorry for posting this here; I&#8217;ve never used a wiki before.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
