Comments on: How Professors Think http://savageminds.org/2009/08/25/how-professors-think/ Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog Sat, 26 May 2012 03:33:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Book: “How Professors Think” « Trinity University Research Programs http://savageminds.org/2009/08/25/how-professors-think/comment-page-1/#comment-619180 Book: “How Professors Think” « Trinity University Research Programs Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:34:31 +0000 http://savageminds.org/?p=2701#comment-619180 [...] Golub, of the anthropology blog Savage Minds, thinks that chapter 5 should be required reading for new scholars, particularly those looking for [...] [...] Golub, of the anthropology blog Savage Minds, thinks that chapter 5 should be required reading for new scholars, particularly those looking for [...]

Report this comment

]]> By: Four Stone Hearth #74 « Natures/Cultures http://savageminds.org/2009/08/25/how-professors-think/comment-page-1/#comment-616338 Four Stone Hearth #74 « Natures/Cultures Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:03:25 +0000 http://savageminds.org/?p=2701#comment-616338 [...] covering reference-management software, what it means to browse as opposed to surf, and of course How Professors Think.  Now, why are we giving that information [...] [...] covering reference-management software, what it means to browse as opposed to surf, and of course How Professors Think.  Now, why are we giving that information [...]

Report this comment

]]> By: Ollie http://savageminds.org/2009/08/25/how-professors-think/comment-page-1/#comment-616336 Ollie Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:04:29 +0000 http://savageminds.org/?p=2701#comment-616336 This sounds like it might form a rather useful complement to the work of Bruno Latour, Andy Pickering and others concerning the actual workings of scientific practice itself and of the inter-agency of both fieldwork and wider research contexts. I guess there has been a tendency to forget that these elements form only one part of scholarly discourse and that there are a whole host of other bureaucracy- and administration-oriented facets to the sociality of academia. This sounds like it might form a rather useful complement to the work of Bruno Latour, Andy Pickering and others concerning the actual workings of scientific practice itself and of the inter-agency of both fieldwork and wider research contexts. I guess there has been a tendency to forget that these elements form only one part of scholarly discourse and that there are a whole host of other bureaucracy- and administration-oriented facets to the sociality of academia.

Report this comment

]]>