<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Around the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://savageminds.org/2008/06/01/around-the-web-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://savageminds.org/2008/06/01/around-the-web-15/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate G.</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2008/06/01/around-the-web-15/comment-page-1/#comment-368932</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2008/06/01/around-the-web-15/#comment-368932</guid>
		<description>First of all, don&#039;t these interviewees watch the Colbert Report before going on?  It&#039;s so funny to watch Diamond try to seriously explain his book to the slippery Colbert.
Second of all, wasn&#039;t the theory that European (or, in Diamond&#039;s terms, Eurasians [but excluding, apparently, Japanese])&#039;superiority&#039; was due to geography (&quot;location, location, location&quot;) disproven decades and decades ago?  I remember that theory being covered and discarded in the first week of a society and environment class back in the &#039;70s.  
BTW, I&#039;m getting so good at addition with the spam protection :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, don&#8217;t these interviewees watch the Colbert Report before going on?  It&#8217;s so funny to watch Diamond try to seriously explain his book to the slippery Colbert.<br />
Second of all, wasn&#8217;t the theory that European (or, in Diamond&#8217;s terms, Eurasians [but excluding, apparently, Japanese])&#8217;superiority&#8217; was due to geography (&#8220;location, location, location&#8221;) disproven decades and decades ago?  I remember that theory being covered and discarded in the first week of a society and environment class back in the &#8217;70s.<br />
BTW, I&#8217;m getting so good at addition with the spam protection :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
