<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Human Terrain and the IRB Puzzle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-132727</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-132727</guid>
		<description>All this points to the larger problem of how ethical standards are institutionalized, which is one of those topics that we&#039;ll continue to grapple with long after this incident is behind us.  

Honestly, the more I learn about HTS, the more confused I get about it.   

Nice work, Strong - keep on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this points to the larger problem of how ethical standards are institutionalized, which is one of those topics that we&#8217;ll continue to grapple with long after this incident is behind us.  </p>
<p>Honestly, the more I learn about HTS, the more confused I get about it.   </p>
<p>Nice work, Strong &#8211; keep on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strong</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-132594</link>
		<dc:creator>Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-132594</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your helpful post.  Yes, in what I have written above, I refer to what is &#039;typically understood&#039; about exemption from IRB review.  It is helpful to know more of the background of this understanding, so thank you.  As I said in the post, I am trying to find out how the people involved understand the situation.  I am less concerned with my own interpretations than with _theirs_.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your helpful post.  Yes, in what I have written above, I refer to what is &#8216;typically understood&#8217; about exemption from IRB review.  It is helpful to know more of the background of this understanding, so thank you.  As I said in the post, I am trying to find out how the people involved understand the situation.  I am less concerned with my own interpretations than with _theirs_.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Schrag</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-132560</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Schrag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-132560</guid>
		<description>I believe you are confusing the regulations with certain interpretations of those regulations--yours and OHRP&#039;s. Please see my blog post, http://institutionalreviewblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/pentagon-says-irb-review-not-needed-for.html, for more details.

Best,

Zachary Schrag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you are confusing the regulations with certain interpretations of those regulations&#8211;yours and OHRP&#8217;s. Please see my blog post, <a href="http://institutionalreviewblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/pentagon-says-irb-review-not-needed-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://institutionalreviewblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/pentagon-says-irb-review-not-needed-for.html</a>, for more details.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Zachary Schrag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strong</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-131799</link>
		<dc:creator>Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-131799</guid>
		<description>Thanks LL and others.  I have been away from the internet for a few days while traveling.  I do hope to follow this inquiry a bit further and will provide further updates as things become clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks LL and others.  I have been away from the internet for a few days while traveling.  I do hope to follow this inquiry a bit further and will provide further updates as things become clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddh•ism ad•junkt &#8250; IRBs and Anthropological Research in War Zones</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-131712</link>
		<dc:creator>buddh•ism ad•junkt &#8250; IRBs and Anthropological Research in War Zones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-131712</guid>
		<description>[...] Strong&#8217;s original piece in Savage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Strong&#8217;s original piece in Savage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.L. Wynn</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-131418</link>
		<dc:creator>L.L. Wynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-131418</guid>
		<description>Strong, your post here has been cited in an article on Inside Higher Ed (http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/10/22/anthro)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strong, your post here has been cited in an article on Inside Higher Ed (<a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/10/22/anthro" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/10/22/anthro</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-130759</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-130759</guid>
		<description>Excellent post by Strong about the legal and jurisdictional issues. Who&#039;s in charge here? DoD? BAE? AAA? 

Have been too busy doing my 150 jump squats and pedagogy of the oppressed essay to atone for previous ad hominem posts to post much here....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post by Strong about the legal and jurisdictional issues. Who&#8217;s in charge here? DoD? BAE? AAA? </p>
<p>Have been too busy doing my 150 jump squats and pedagogy of the oppressed essay to atone for previous ad hominem posts to post much here&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-130461</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-130461</guid>
		<description>Judy, I didn&#039;t say that money shouldn&#039;t be part of the discussion.  It&#039;s part of that complicated picture that Strong talks about.  

But we&#039;re anthropologists, right?  Reducing complex situations to single variables and motivations, and pinning those on an individual that most of us have never met, isn&#039;t what we&#039;re trained to do.  Let&#039;s not do it here.  

Jeff, to the jump squats and essay I&#039;d add wind sprints and a Powerpoint presentation on Chomsky&#039;s _Problems of Knowledge and Freedom_.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy, I didn&#8217;t say that money shouldn&#8217;t be part of the discussion.  It&#8217;s part of that complicated picture that Strong talks about.  </p>
<p>But we&#8217;re anthropologists, right?  Reducing complex situations to single variables and motivations, and pinning those on an individual that most of us have never met, isn&#8217;t what we&#8217;re trained to do.  Let&#8217;s not do it here.  </p>
<p>Jeff, to the jump squats and essay I&#8217;d add wind sprints and a Powerpoint presentation on Chomsky&#8217;s _Problems of Knowledge and Freedom_.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judy t</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-130429</link>
		<dc:creator>judy t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-130429</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that Americans are comfortable viewing high paid Blackwater contractors as having different &quot;patriotic&quot; motivations than army soldiers, but we can&#039;t think this way about anthropologists contractors? 

Why? 

Blackwater shooters earn $200,000 a year and these anthropologist contractors must be earning something like this too. This should be part of the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that Americans are comfortable viewing high paid Blackwater contractors as having different &#8220;patriotic&#8221; motivations than army soldiers, but we can&#8217;t think this way about anthropologists contractors? </p>
<p>Why? </p>
<p>Blackwater shooters earn $200,000 a year and these anthropologist contractors must be earning something like this too. This should be part of the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff M</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-130258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-130258</guid>
		<description>BBH -

Dittoes on what Laura said. Shame on you!

Standard penance for the crime of _ad homicide_ is 150 jump squats and an essay in your own words on how Paulo Friere&#039;s concept of &quot;dialogue&quot;:http://www.marxists.org/subject/education/freire/pedagogy/ch03.htm relates to our community project of ending the Global War on Terror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBH -</p>
<p>Dittoes on what Laura said. Shame on you!</p>
<p>Standard penance for the crime of _ad homicide_ is 150 jump squats and an essay in your own words on how Paulo Friere&#8217;s concept of &#8220;dialogue&#8221;:http://www.marxists.org/subject/education/freire/pedagogy/ch03.htm relates to our community project of ending the Global War on Terror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-130194</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-130194</guid>
		<description>BBH, I think this is unfair to Marcus Griffin. Ad hominem attacks like the one you just leveled don&#039;t get the discipline anywhere. You just lowered the bar straight into the basement when it comes to intelligent discussion about the relationship between anthropology and the military - and ironically, you&#039;ve done precisely the opposite of what Strong advocates.  

Like a lot of anthropologists, I&#039;ve got plenty of questions about the HTS program. But it&#039;s simply not productive to engage in such virulently personal attacks on people who&#039;ve made decisions that I might not make myself. Why not give Griffin the benefit of the doubt?   Maybe he&#039;s not in it for the money. Maybe he&#039;s really trying to do something about the violence on the ground in Iraq.  It&#039;s really easy for those of us who&#039;ve decided that HTS is &#039;wrong&#039; (whatever that means) to rip people like Griffin apart without ever meeting the guy or engaging in a conversation with him to really understand what is reasoning is.  He&#039;s certainly not the only person who believes that anthropologists might in some small way help minimize casualties to US and Iraqi civilians, and I doubt he&#039;s the only anthropologist who thinks so.  

As Strong has pointed out so elegantly, &quot;..it is vital that we calmly and carefully produce a complete picture of the situation rather than simply cast aspersions.&quot;     That&#039;s a mantra worth repeating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBH, I think this is unfair to Marcus Griffin. Ad hominem attacks like the one you just leveled don&#8217;t get the discipline anywhere. You just lowered the bar straight into the basement when it comes to intelligent discussion about the relationship between anthropology and the military &#8211; and ironically, you&#8217;ve done precisely the opposite of what Strong advocates.  </p>
<p>Like a lot of anthropologists, I&#8217;ve got plenty of questions about the HTS program. But it&#8217;s simply not productive to engage in such virulently personal attacks on people who&#8217;ve made decisions that I might not make myself. Why not give Griffin the benefit of the doubt?   Maybe he&#8217;s not in it for the money. Maybe he&#8217;s really trying to do something about the violence on the ground in Iraq.  It&#8217;s really easy for those of us who&#8217;ve decided that HTS is &#8216;wrong&#8217; (whatever that means) to rip people like Griffin apart without ever meeting the guy or engaging in a conversation with him to really understand what is reasoning is.  He&#8217;s certainly not the only person who believes that anthropologists might in some small way help minimize casualties to US and Iraqi civilians, and I doubt he&#8217;s the only anthropologist who thinks so.  </p>
<p>As Strong has pointed out so elegantly, &#8220;..it is vital that we calmly and carefully produce a complete picture of the situation rather than simply cast aspersions.&#8221;     That&#8217;s a mantra worth repeating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbh</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-129671</link>
		<dc:creator>bbh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-129671</guid>
		<description>nice research.  Griffin is in it for the tax free big bucks. He doesn&#039;t give a crap about ethics and won&#039;t take any responsibility for not considering the ethics of what he does, he&#039;s turned those decisions over the McFate. McFate&#039;s at war, so she can&#039;t be bothered with ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice research.  Griffin is in it for the tax free big bucks. He doesn&#8217;t give a crap about ethics and won&#8217;t take any responsibility for not considering the ethics of what he does, he&#8217;s turned those decisions over the McFate. McFate&#8217;s at war, so she can&#8217;t be bothered with ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.L. Wynn</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-129028</link>
		<dc:creator>L.L. Wynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-129028</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Strong, for going to the considerable effort to research this question and report on it.  It grounds the discussion about the ethics of anthropologists working for the military in some useful, concrete facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Strong, for going to the considerable effort to research this question and report on it.  It grounds the discussion about the ethics of anthropologists working for the military in some useful, concrete facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sommers</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-128990</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sommers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/#comment-128990</guid>
		<description>There was a time I believed that real scientific analysis of the situation would have produced much better recommendations than the CIA briefly meeting with Iraq exiles. But at that time, no one was interested in what a bunch of ivory tower social scientists were saying. I&#039;m puzzled by why the decision to do this is being made now. This is obviously not a first choice solution to the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan. The initial perception was clearly that military and professional managers could handle these problems. The incorporation of social scientists into the war is not a well thought out partnership. It&#039;s a last ditch attempt to handle a war that&#039;s grown so far out of control that conventional solutions appear useless. I share the concern of the image that will be left by this experiment. After all, it&#039;s not uncommon to perceive journalists and aid workers as spies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time I believed that real scientific analysis of the situation would have produced much better recommendations than the CIA briefly meeting with Iraq exiles. But at that time, no one was interested in what a bunch of ivory tower social scientists were saying. I&#8217;m puzzled by why the decision to do this is being made now. This is obviously not a first choice solution to the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan. The initial perception was clearly that military and professional managers could handle these problems. The incorporation of social scientists into the war is not a well thought out partnership. It&#8217;s a last ditch attempt to handle a war that&#8217;s grown so far out of control that conventional solutions appear useless. I share the concern of the image that will be left by this experiment. After all, it&#8217;s not uncommon to perceive journalists and aid workers as spies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
