<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking about diversity in the aftermath of Michael Richards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/</link>
	<description>Notes and Queries in Anthropology — A Group Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher de la Torre</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41892</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher de la Torre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 04:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41892</guid>
		<description>How about Racism without racists? Patricia Hill Collins anyone? Check out my comments here: http://scriptedaddicted.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/paris-riots-revisted/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Racism without racists? Patricia Hill Collins anyone? Check out my comments here: <a href="http://scriptedaddicted.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/paris-riots-revisted/" rel="nofollow">http://scriptedaddicted.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/paris-riots-revisted/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsalljustaride</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41381</link>
		<dc:creator>itsalljustaride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41381</guid>
		<description>Exactly. I wholly agree with that statement, and I should have been more clear. Seinfeld DID play to a predominantly white audience, as most mainstream television does, however, Seinfeld really never touched on issues of race besides some comments about how cookies embody diversity. The non-white characters in Seinfeld were often one-dimensional charicatures, but so were the main characters, as is usually the case with sitcoms. There is nothing complex about George, the neurotic stout balding character, or Kramer, the wacky neighbor. They are all just charicatures. The focus of the non-white characters in the show was not usually about their ethnicity, or their skin color, but personality traits that went beyond some simple racial or ethnic otherness. The Soup Nazi wasn&#039;t quirky because he was Eastern European or Russian, he was quirky because he was a fascistic cook. Likewise, the personality focus of character that Danny Hoch was slated to play was not his ethnicity, but rather his fawning need for Jerry&#039;s friendship. Everyone is a charicature on a tv sitcom, but whether or not the ethnic or racial &quot;otherness&quot; is the focus is the important point to look at. The most stereotyping that went on in Seinfeld usually had to do with a character having a foriegn accent. Something which you encounter quite often in a major metropolitan city, and world wide economic hub like NYC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. I wholly agree with that statement, and I should have been more clear. Seinfeld DID play to a predominantly white audience, as most mainstream television does, however, Seinfeld really never touched on issues of race besides some comments about how cookies embody diversity. The non-white characters in Seinfeld were often one-dimensional charicatures, but so were the main characters, as is usually the case with sitcoms. There is nothing complex about George, the neurotic stout balding character, or Kramer, the wacky neighbor. They are all just charicatures. The focus of the non-white characters in the show was not usually about their ethnicity, or their skin color, but personality traits that went beyond some simple racial or ethnic otherness. The Soup Nazi wasn&#8217;t quirky because he was Eastern European or Russian, he was quirky because he was a fascistic cook. Likewise, the personality focus of character that Danny Hoch was slated to play was not his ethnicity, but rather his fawning need for Jerry&#8217;s friendship. Everyone is a charicature on a tv sitcom, but whether or not the ethnic or racial &#8220;otherness&#8221; is the focus is the important point to look at. The most stereotyping that went on in Seinfeld usually had to do with a character having a foriegn accent. Something which you encounter quite often in a major metropolitan city, and world wide economic hub like NYC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meep</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41372</link>
		<dc:creator>Meep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41372</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;itsalljustaride&quot;&gt;but it’s not like Seinfeld was ever supposed to be racial in any way, positive or negative.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I think perhaps you should look at it from another side. The face of television in mainstream America is generally white. You have to have the kind of enculturation in order to relate to it in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="itsalljustaride"><p>but it’s not like Seinfeld was ever supposed to be racial in any way, positive or negative.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think perhaps you should look at it from another side. The face of television in mainstream America is generally white. You have to have the kind of enculturation in order to relate to it in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsalljustaride</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41326</link>
		<dc:creator>itsalljustaride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41326</guid>
		<description>I think that video Danny Hoch&#039;s about Seinfeld completely misses the point as well. The show Seinfeld was ABOUT sheltered neurotic white people. We weren&#039;t supposed to feel good about the things they did, we were supposed to laugh at how awful they were as human beings. Furthermore, we were supposed to look at them and realize that many of us are just as sheltered and moronic as they are. Danny didn&#039;t want to play a character, that&#039;s fine, but it&#039;s not like Seinfeld was ever supposed to be racial in any way, positive or negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that video Danny Hoch&#8217;s about Seinfeld completely misses the point as well. The show Seinfeld was ABOUT sheltered neurotic white people. We weren&#8217;t supposed to feel good about the things they did, we were supposed to laugh at how awful they were as human beings. Furthermore, we were supposed to look at them and realize that many of us are just as sheltered and moronic as they are. Danny didn&#8217;t want to play a character, that&#8217;s fine, but it&#8217;s not like Seinfeld was ever supposed to be racial in any way, positive or negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Edenbaum</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41316</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Edenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41316</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;b&gt;Michael Richards lost his shit for the same reason white people always get mad when black people talk at the movies.&lt;/b&gt;&quot; [boldface in original]
No. It&#039;s simple, Michael Richards behaved like a schmuck. 
Again: he&#039;s a professional comedian who&#039;s been through this before. Whatever it was that pushed him over the edge, it wasn&#039;t new to him.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Black people talk at the movies&lt;/i&gt;&quot; is to the history of audience participation in Afro-American culture what &quot;&lt;i&gt;Jews are good with money&lt;/i&gt;&quot; is to the history of Middle Eastern traders and European Anti-Semitism. Read the comments at Anil Dash&#039;s page.  Watch Danny Hoch rip Seinfeld a new one: no one&#039;s responded to that. 
Dash&#039;s BS is not dealing with the issue, it avoids dealing with the issue. He asks complex questions to avoid asking hard ones, overintellectualizing to avoid serious thought. I find that pretension given the context, even more annoying than usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<b>Michael Richards lost his shit for the same reason white people always get mad when black people talk at the movies.</b>&#8221; [boldface in original]<br />
No. It&#8217;s simple, Michael Richards behaved like a schmuck.<br />
Again: he&#8217;s a professional comedian who&#8217;s been through this before. Whatever it was that pushed him over the edge, it wasn&#8217;t new to him.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Black people talk at the movies</i>&#8221; is to the history of audience participation in Afro-American culture what &#8220;<i>Jews are good with money</i>&#8221; is to the history of Middle Eastern traders and European Anti-Semitism. Read the comments at Anil Dash&#8217;s page.  Watch Danny Hoch rip Seinfeld a new one: no one&#8217;s responded to that.<br />
Dash&#8217;s BS is not dealing with the issue, it avoids dealing with the issue. He asks complex questions to avoid asking hard ones, overintellectualizing to avoid serious thought. I find that pretension given the context, even more annoying than usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsalljustaride</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41314</link>
		<dc:creator>itsalljustaride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41314</guid>
		<description>Exactly, and I think that Richards has more of a control issue than a racial issue. Then again I don&#039;t know Richards personally so I can&#039;t really say in regards to the his racism or lack of it. Just using racial slurs doesn&#039;t really make someone a racist. It makes them a jerk, or ignorant, or an ignorant jerk, but not inherently &quot;a racist&quot;. Comedians in particular tend to blur this line for many reasons. Words are weapons, and Richards used the nuclear option here, and his act blew up on him. Just like if I get mad at my girlfriend and call her ugly just to spite her, regardless of whether or not I think she is in fact ugly (i should hope not) I am sure to be sleeping on the couch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, and I think that Richards has more of a control issue than a racial issue. Then again I don&#8217;t know Richards personally so I can&#8217;t really say in regards to the his racism or lack of it. Just using racial slurs doesn&#8217;t really make someone a racist. It makes them a jerk, or ignorant, or an ignorant jerk, but not inherently &#8220;a racist&#8221;. Comedians in particular tend to blur this line for many reasons. Words are weapons, and Richards used the nuclear option here, and his act blew up on him. Just like if I get mad at my girlfriend and call her ugly just to spite her, regardless of whether or not I think she is in fact ugly (i should hope not) I am sure to be sleeping on the couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerim</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41308</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41308</guid>
		<description>Several links here to the Sinbad commentary, which is excellent. About 3/4 of the way through Sinbad articulates how he relates to the audience, emphasizing that the way he works relies on a certain amount of back-and-forth, and that he doesn&#039;t feel the same need for &quot;control.&quot; Just saying ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several links here to the Sinbad commentary, which is excellent. About 3/4 of the way through Sinbad articulates how he relates to the audience, emphasizing that the way he works relies on a certain amount of back-and-forth, and that he doesn&#8217;t feel the same need for &#8220;control.&#8221; Just saying &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsalljustaride</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41291</link>
		<dc:creator>itsalljustaride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41291</guid>
		<description>This from YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBMQn5t3lRk

is probably the best commentary on the incident I&#039;ve seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from YouTube:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBMQn5t3lRk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBMQn5t3lRk</a></p>
<p>is probably the best commentary on the incident I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsalljustaride</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41282</link>
		<dc:creator>itsalljustaride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41282</guid>
		<description>First, In response to Kerim&#039;s Robocop comment, and maniaku&#039;s response, this is the kind of experience you expect when going to films you KNOW will be bad, or that do not require a great deal of concentration to keep up with (if keeping up with the plot or action is even a goal in mind at all). When I would hang out at anime screening clubs there was usually an MST3K element that would go on where people would try to make funny or ironic comments about the film being screened. It isn&#039;t particularly racialized as such, but it may be more prevalent within the black community. It&#039;s certainly not unheard of in the white community though.

The problem is that in the situation of a comedy club the heckler is a force that can interrupt the actual event. A movie keeps playing, no matter what, but an unruly drunk and disrespectful heckler can bring a comic&#039;s performance to a halt. Thus, it is usually the case that comics learn to deal with hecklers by including them in the performance and playing off of them to keep the show going (since that is basically the heckler&#039;s goal anyway, to usurp the throne, so to speak).

I still havn&#039;t made up my mind whether Richards was actually acting with racist intent, or if he just knew that these words would trigger a response in the hecklers, as the hecklers also traded racial insults (understandably so). It&#039;s inexcusable in any case. But imagine if Carlos Mencia were the one saying those things. That guy seems to be able to get away with perpetuating every racist steretype in the book (and not in an ironic way) and no one bats an eye. Replace Richards with Mencia and I bet everyone would have been howling with laughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, In response to Kerim&#8217;s Robocop comment, and maniaku&#8217;s response, this is the kind of experience you expect when going to films you KNOW will be bad, or that do not require a great deal of concentration to keep up with (if keeping up with the plot or action is even a goal in mind at all). When I would hang out at anime screening clubs there was usually an MST3K element that would go on where people would try to make funny or ironic comments about the film being screened. It isn&#8217;t particularly racialized as such, but it may be more prevalent within the black community. It&#8217;s certainly not unheard of in the white community though.</p>
<p>The problem is that in the situation of a comedy club the heckler is a force that can interrupt the actual event. A movie keeps playing, no matter what, but an unruly drunk and disrespectful heckler can bring a comic&#8217;s performance to a halt. Thus, it is usually the case that comics learn to deal with hecklers by including them in the performance and playing off of them to keep the show going (since that is basically the heckler&#8217;s goal anyway, to usurp the throne, so to speak).</p>
<p>I still havn&#8217;t made up my mind whether Richards was actually acting with racist intent, or if he just knew that these words would trigger a response in the hecklers, as the hecklers also traded racial insults (understandably so). It&#8217;s inexcusable in any case. But imagine if Carlos Mencia were the one saying those things. That guy seems to be able to get away with perpetuating every racist steretype in the book (and not in an ironic way) and no one bats an eye. Replace Richards with Mencia and I bet everyone would have been howling with laughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Edenbaum</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41276</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Edenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41276</guid>
		<description>Michael Richards is a professional comic, and he&#039;s been around for 25 years. Stand-Up  is vulgar theater. He&#039;s been heckled before, and he knows what it&#039;s like.  Kerim, you&#039;ve missed one of the most important rules of intellectual life, the KISS rule: &lt;i&gt;Keep it Simple Stupid&lt;/i&gt;.  Don&#039;t make generalizations when the details will suffice.  Especially in matters of race you go out on thin ice very quickly.  Amil Dash by his own admission is a geek, and geeks don&#039;t like empiricism. It&#039;s too sloppy.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8HfgFJnSCM&amp;eurl=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Danny Hoch&lt;/a&gt; explains it. [courtesy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://redstateson.blogspot.com/2006/11/two-fer_24.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dennis Perrin&lt;/a&gt;]
Aside from his bullshit theorizing, Dash at least links to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hiphopmusic.com/archives/002150.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;someone else&lt;/a&gt; who links to the commentary of another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/showbiz/2006/11/21/anderson.intv.sinbad.richards.cnn&amp;wm=10&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pro&lt;/a&gt; who was there.
It was not Times Square, and it was not &lt;i&gt;Amateur Night&lt;/i&gt; at the Apollo, where the audience is the arbiter.  Once you&#039;ve gotten the details then you &lt;i&gt;may&lt;/i&gt; choose to get into a discussion of the modalities of audience response, but there&#039;s no reason to be as quick to find racial divisions as you were; that decision had more to do with your interest in making associations than with the subject at hand.

I take this shit personally. But I think I&#039;ve mde my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Richards is a professional comic, and he&#8217;s been around for 25 years. Stand-Up  is vulgar theater. He&#8217;s been heckled before, and he knows what it&#8217;s like.  Kerim, you&#8217;ve missed one of the most important rules of intellectual life, the KISS rule: <i>Keep it Simple Stupid</i>.  Don&#8217;t make generalizations when the details will suffice.  Especially in matters of race you go out on thin ice very quickly.  Amil Dash by his own admission is a geek, and geeks don&#8217;t like empiricism. It&#8217;s too sloppy.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8HfgFJnSCM&amp;eurl=" rel="nofollow">Danny Hoch</a> explains it. [courtesy of <a href="http://redstateson.blogspot.com/2006/11/two-fer_24.html" rel="nofollow">Dennis Perrin</a>]<br />
Aside from his bullshit theorizing, Dash at least links to <a href="http://www.hiphopmusic.com/archives/002150.html" rel="nofollow">someone else</a> who links to the commentary of another <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/showbiz/2006/11/21/anderson.intv.sinbad.richards.cnn&amp;wm=10" rel="nofollow">pro</a> who was there.<br />
It was not Times Square, and it was not <i>Amateur Night</i> at the Apollo, where the audience is the arbiter.  Once you&#8217;ve gotten the details then you <i>may</i> choose to get into a discussion of the modalities of audience response, but there&#8217;s no reason to be as quick to find racial divisions as you were; that decision had more to do with your interest in making associations than with the subject at hand.</p>
<p>I take this shit personally. But I think I&#8217;ve mde my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maniaku</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41152</link>
		<dc:creator>maniaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41152</guid>
		<description>The RoboCop anecdote reminds me of the hoppola surrounding Snakes on a Plane and the general trash-film experience...which I don&#039;t think is particularly &quot;racialized&quot;. But maybe you are talking about something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RoboCop anecdote reminds me of the hoppola surrounding Snakes on a Plane and the general trash-film experience&#8230;which I don&#8217;t think is particularly &#8220;racialized&#8221;. But maybe you are talking about something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerim</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41125</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 01:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41125</guid>
		<description>Rex,

We could look at AAVE - there are some regional features in common with Southern English, but there are strong affinities across urban areas even on opposite coasts, and there are many features which are not reducible to region. I don\&#039;t know if that is the case here, but I would not be surprised.

Obviously class is important, but it would be hard to say how it is important. There is obviously strong pressure to conform as one moves up the socio-economic ladder. But there is also a fair amount of code-switching that goes on. One would have to see if the same behavior was exhibited in different neighborhoods.

From personal experience in NY it is very much about neighborhood. Before Times Square was turned into Disney World I used to watch movies there with a predominantly black audience. It was a very different experience than watching movies in other neighborhoods. In Robo Cop 2, when they were standing around in a circle shooting him, everyone was screaming \&quot;Oh shit!\&quot; and the like. When his body stopped twitching the theater fell silent, until one person said \&quot;Is he dead?\&quot; Everyone laughed, and then one women yelled \&quot;Yeah, they killed the mutherfucker!!!\&quot; 

Now, most theaters in mid-town wouldn\&#039;t allow this kind of behavior now, but in Queens it is a different matter. There it is still uncertain what standards prevail, and I\&#039;ve been in movies where a couple of people are engaging in this kind of back-and-forth with the movie while other people find it inappropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex,</p>
<p>We could look at AAVE &#8211; there are some regional features in common with Southern English, but there are strong affinities across urban areas even on opposite coasts, and there are many features which are not reducible to region. I don\&#8217;t know if that is the case here, but I would not be surprised.</p>
<p>Obviously class is important, but it would be hard to say how it is important. There is obviously strong pressure to conform as one moves up the socio-economic ladder. But there is also a fair amount of code-switching that goes on. One would have to see if the same behavior was exhibited in different neighborhoods.</p>
<p>From personal experience in NY it is very much about neighborhood. Before Times Square was turned into Disney World I used to watch movies there with a predominantly black audience. It was a very different experience than watching movies in other neighborhoods. In Robo Cop 2, when they were standing around in a circle shooting him, everyone was screaming \&#8221;Oh shit!\&#8221; and the like. When his body stopped twitching the theater fell silent, until one person said \&#8221;Is he dead?\&#8221; Everyone laughed, and then one women yelled \&#8221;Yeah, they killed the mutherfucker!!!\&#8221; </p>
<p>Now, most theaters in mid-town wouldn\&#8217;t allow this kind of behavior now, but in Queens it is a different matter. There it is still uncertain what standards prevail, and I\&#8217;ve been in movies where a couple of people are engaging in this kind of back-and-forth with the movie while other people find it inappropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerim</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41122</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41122</guid>
		<description>It seems our race category is also our genetics category, not my fault!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems our race category is also our genetics category, not my fault!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Edenbaum</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41110</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Edenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41110</guid>
		<description>This post is listed under &quot;North America , Race, Genetics[?]&quot;
And Anil Dash sounds like a self consciously liberal VS Naipaul explaining negroes to white people.  That&#039;s fucked. No other word to use.
Much worse than the spiel was the ritual of forgiveness and therapy Richard&#039;s felt he had to go through. That was truly pathetic. 
Racism is a fact of life.  It&#039;s the hypocrisy that should make people cringe: racism as &lt;i&gt;disease&lt;/i&gt;. &quot;I need... help&quot;

If Richards had any guts he&#039;d find a black comic to work with and push it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is listed under &#8220;North America , Race, Genetics[?]&#8221;<br />
And Anil Dash sounds like a self consciously liberal VS Naipaul explaining negroes to white people.  That&#8217;s fucked. No other word to use.<br />
Much worse than the spiel was the ritual of forgiveness and therapy Richard&#8217;s felt he had to go through. That was truly pathetic.<br />
Racism is a fact of life.  It&#8217;s the hypocrisy that should make people cringe: racism as <i>disease</i>. &#8220;I need&#8230; help&#8221;</p>
<p>If Richards had any guts he&#8217;d find a black comic to work with and push it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-41098</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savageminds.org/2006/11/24/thinking-about-diversity-in-the-aftermath-of-michael-richards/#comment-41098</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.... I wonder how well other explanations of this difference would work out. Could this be a class thing rather than a race thing, or a regional (northern vs southern) thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;. I wonder how well other explanations of this difference would work out. Could this be a class thing rather than a race thing, or a regional (northern vs southern) thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
